Let $a < b$ and $f:[a, b] \rightarrow \mathbb R$ be a Riemann integral function. Suppose that $f(x) \geq 0$ for all $x \in [a, b]$. I want to show whether $\int_a^bf(x) = 0$ implies $f(x) = 0$ or not, but I'm not sure where to start. I don't know much about Riemann integral functions in general. I only know that $$\underline{\int_a^b} f= \overline{\int_a^b} f.$$ Also, I know the fact that if $f$ is continuous, then $f(x) = 0$ for all $x\in [a, b]$. Can anyone provide any hints for me, because I'm really confused about this whole thing.
2026-03-27 00:58:10.1774573090
Does $\int_a^bf(x) = 0$ imply $f(x) = 0$ for a Riemann Integral function?
1.7k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in DEFINITE-INTEGRALS
- How can I prove that $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{\ln(1+\cos(\alpha)\cos(x))}{\cos(x)}dx=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\pi^2}{4}-\alpha^2\right)$?
- Closed form of integration
- Integral of ratio of polynomial
- An inequality involving $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\sqrt{\sin x}\:dx $
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Roots of the quadratic eqn
- Area between curves finding pressure
- Hint required : Why is the integral $\int_0^x \frac{\sin(t)}{1+t}\mathrm{d}t$ positive?
- A definite integral of a rational function: How can this be transformed from trivial to obvious by a change in viewpoint?
- Integrate exponential over shifted square root
Related Questions in RIEMANN-SUM
- Which type of Riemann Sum is the most accurate?
- How to evaluate a Riemann (Darboux?) integral?
- Hint required : Why is the integral $\int_0^x \frac{\sin(t)}{1+t}\mathrm{d}t$ positive?
- Method for evaluating Darboux integrals by a sequence of partitions?
- How to tell whether a left and right riemann sum are overestiamtes and underestimates?
- Calculating an integral using the limit definition
- How to express a Riemann sum as a definite integral
- Proof of $\int_{a}^{a} f(x)dx = 0$
- A confusion about the proof of Darboux Criterion
- $\int _0^ax\left(1-\frac{x}{a}\right)dx\:$ using Riemann Sums
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Suppose that $f : [a,b] \to [0,\infty)$ is Riemann integrable and that $$ \int_{a}^{b} f(x)\,\mathrm{d}x = 0. $$ As noted in the question, if $f$ is continuous on $[a,b]$, then $f(x) = 0$ for all $x \in [a,b]$. This particular result has been demonstrated repeatedly on Math StackExchange, see, for example, this post and the posts linked to that post (on the sidebar to the right once you click the link).
If the hypothesis of continuity is dropped, the result no longer holds. For example, fix some point $c \in [a,b]$ and consider a function $f$ defined by $$ f(x) = \begin{cases} 1 & \text{if $x = c$, and} \\ 0 & \text{otherwise.} \end{cases} $$ This function is not identically zero, but $$ \int_{a}^{b} f(x)\,\mathrm{d}x = 0. $$ Indeed, if $C = \{c_n\}_{n\in \mathbb{N}}$ is some countable collection of points in the interval $[a,b]$ and $\{a_n\}_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ is a collection of positive numbers, then the function $$ f(x) = \begin{cases} a_n & \text{if $x = c_n \in C$, and} \\ 0 & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} $$ is a nonzero function which integrates to zero. In other words, a nonnegative Riemann integrable function may be strictly positive on a countable collection of points and still integrate to zero.
Hence knowing that a nonnegative function integrates to zero on some interval is not sufficient to conclude that the function is identically zero on that interval. One either needs to adjust the hypotheses to include continuity, or one needs to introduce a notion of being zero "almost everywhere".