My intuition is that it requires the axiom of choice to prove that if a bounded function $f$ on a bounded subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is Riemann integrable, the discontinuity set of $f$ is measure zero. Is this correct?
2026-04-08 09:26:34.1775640394
Does “Riemann integrable $\Rightarrow$ discontinuity set is measure zero” need axiom of choice?
314 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in RIEMANN-INTEGRATION
- Riemann Integrability of a function and its reciprocal
- How to evaluate a Riemann (Darboux?) integral?
- Reimann-Stieltjes Integral and Expectation for Discrete Random Variable
- Hint required : Why is the integral $\int_0^x \frac{\sin(t)}{1+t}\mathrm{d}t$ positive?
- Method for evaluating Darboux integrals by a sequence of partitions?
- Proof verification: showing that $f(x) = \begin{cases}1, & \text{if $x = 0$} \\0,&\text{if $x \ne 0$}\end{cases}$ is Riemann integrable?
- prove a function is integrable not just with limits
- Intervals where $f$ is Riemann integrable?
- Understanding extended Riemann integral in Munkres.
- Lebesgue-integrating a non-Riemann integrable function
Related Questions in AXIOM-OF-CHOICE
- Do I need the axiom of choice to prove this statement?
- Canonical choice of many elements not contained in a set
- Strength of $\sf ZF$+The weak topology on every Banach space is Hausdorff
- Example of sets that are not measurable?
- A,B Sets injective map A into B or bijection subset A onto B
- Equivalence of axiom of choice
- Proving the axiom of choice in propositions as types
- Does Diaconescu's theorem imply cubical type theory is non-constructive?
- Axiom of choice condition.
- How does Axiom of Choice imply Axiom of Dependent Choice?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
No, you don't need the axiom of choice. You can read the standard proof here.
This proof involves the sets $X_{1/n}$, defined as the points whose oscillation is greater than $1/n$, $n\in \mathbb{N}$. The set of discontinuities of $f$ is $\bigcup X_{1/n}$, since $f$ is continuous at a point iff the oscillation there is zero. For the shake of contradiction, if you suppose that the set of $f$'s discontinuities doesn't have measure zero, then there exists some $n_0\in\mathbb{N}$ such that $X_{1/n_0}$ isn't a null set (otherwise, since any countable union of null sets is null, the set of discontinuities will have zero measure!).
Maybe you got confused with the choice of $X_{1/n_0}$, thinking that the axiom of choice was needed. But $X_{1/n_0}$ isn't chosen, it must exist if the set of discontinuities isn't null.