I'm looking at a situation in which I have, say, two Borel spaces, X,Y, and a correspondence F from one to the other whose graph is projective (i.e., the projective hierarchy), or perhaps even analytically measurable (i.e., in the sigma-algebra generated by the analytic sets). I want there to be a universally measurable (or even P-measurable, for some fixed Borel measure P on X) selector of F. I don't think this follows under ZFC, but if one assumes, e.g., projective determinacy, can it be shown? Please note I am not really a hardcore logic person, rather an analysist, so please reply in a language an analysist can understand, thanks!
2026-03-30 00:22:51.1774830171
Does some axiom independent of ZFC (e.g., PD) imply that a correspondence with a projective graph have universally measurable selectors?
90 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LOGIC
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What is (mathematically) minimal computer architecture to run any software
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Determine the truth value and validity of the propositions given
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- Help with Propositional Logic Proof
- Symbol for assignment of a truth-value?
- Find the truth value of... empty set?
- Do I need the axiom of choice to prove this statement?
- Prove that any truth function $f$ can be represented by a formula $φ$ in cnf by negating a formula in dnf
Related Questions in DESCRIPTIVE-SET-THEORY
- Are compact groups acting on Polish spaces essentially Polish?
- For any countable ordinal $\alpha$, there is some closed set of reals whose Cantor-Bendixson rank is $\alpha$
- how to construct a rudimentary function $h$ used in the paper ''scales in $L(\mathbb{R})$''
- Under $MA+\neg CH$ there exists a $Q$-set.
- Separating closed sets in the bubble space. (a.k.a Moore plane a.ka. Niemytzki plane.)
- Precision on the Baire property
- Uniqueness in Baire property representation for compact Hausdorff spaces
- Can height of tree more than $\aleph_0$
- Example of a unit circle subset that is $F_{\sigma\delta}$ but not $F_\sigma$
- Finite approximations to transfinite sums of real numbers.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes! For terminology, suppose $X$ and $Y$ are Polish spaces and $F\subseteq X\times Y$. A set $G\subseteq F$ uniformizes $F$ if $G$ is the graph of a function $g\colon \pi_X(F)\to Y$, called the uniformizing function. Note that if $U\subseteq Y$ is open, then $g^{-1}(U) = \pi_X(G\cap (X\times U))$, so if $G$ is $\mathbf{\Sigma}^1_{n}$ in the projective heirarchy, then $g$ has the property that the preimage of every open set is $\mathbf{\Sigma}^1_{n}$ (since $\mathbf{\Sigma}^1_{n}$ is closed under projection).
It's a theorem of Moschovakis (Theorem 1 in Uniformization in a playful universe, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 77 (1971), 731-736) that under Projective Determinacy (PD), every projective set $F$ is uniformized by a projective set $G$, and thus has a uniformizing function $g$ with the property that the preimage of every open set is a projective set. Since PD also implies that projective sets are universally measurable, $g$ is universally measurable.
Uniformization results are treated extensively in Moschovakis's book Descriptive Set Theory, which is freely available on the author's webpage. The uniformization theorem is Theorem 6C.5, and the theorem that projective sets are universally measurable is Exercise 6A.18.
Here's some additional information. Caveat: I'm far an expert in this stuff. But if I've made any errors here, I'm sure someone (Noah Schweber, maybe?) will correct them.
The von Neumann selection theorem (Exercise 4E.9 in Moschovakis) is a theorem of ZFC: Every analytic ($\mathbf{\Sigma}^1_1$) set has a uniformizing function that is universally measurable.
This is the best possible result of this kind in ZFC: It is consistent with ZFC (it follows from $V = L$) that there is a function $f\colon X\to Y$ between Polish spaces which is not Lebesgue measurable, but whose graph $F\subseteq X\times Y$ is $\mathbf{\Pi}^1_1$. Note that $f$ is the unique uniformizing function of $F$, so $F$ is a $\mathbf{\Pi}^1_1$ set with no Lebesgue measurable uniformizing function. See Exercise 5A.7 in Moschovakis.
In the positive direction, if you only need to uniformize sets which are $\mathbf{\Sigma}^1_2$ (this class contains sets you call analytically measurable: $\sigma(\mathbf{\Sigma}^1_1)$, which in turn contains all $\mathbf{\Pi}^1_1$ and $\mathbf{\Sigma}^1_1$ sets), you can get away with assuming a lot less than PD. It's a theorem of ZFC that every $\mathbf{\Sigma}^1_2$ set can be uniformized by a $\mathbf{\Sigma}^1_2$ set, (this is the Kondo uniformization theorem, Theorem 4E.4 in Moschovakis). And Analytic Determinacy (determinacy restricted to $\mathbf{\Sigma}^1_1$ sets) implies that every $\mathbf{\Sigma}^1_2$ set is universally measurable (Exercise 6G.12 in Moschovakis). Thus, assuming Analytic Determinacy, every $\mathbf{\Sigma}^1_2$ set has a universally measurable uniformizing function. Analytic Determinacy has much lower consistency strength than Projective Determinacy - for example, it follows from the existence of a measurable cardinal.
The book Classical Descriptive Set Theory by Kechris is another good reference for this material. Moschovakis uniformization is Corollary 39.9 on p. 339, universal measurability of projective sets is Theorem 38.17 on p. 326, the von Neumann selection theorem is Theorem 18.1 on p. 120, the Kondo uniformization theorem is Corollary 38.7 on p. 323, and the universal measurability of $\mathbf{\Sigma}^1_2$ sets is Theorem 36.20 on p. 307.