Here is a sequence I came across while reading and I was wondering if it could be used fairly effectively to find primes: $ (2\mathbb{N}+1)^2+4 $. It's basically taking successive odd numbers, squaring them and adding four to them. The first 9 terms of the sequence contain a whopping 7 primes! There's also quite a few semiprimes. But I'm sure the percentage of primes goes down fairly quickly as you continue the sequence. Still, does this sequence filter for primes particularly well or not?
What about the sequence: $ 1^2+4, (1)(3)+4, 3^2+4, (3)(5)+4, 5^2+4,(5)(7)+4, 7^2+4, ...? $ Does this one do better?
Using $x^2 + x + 41$ for $0 \leq x \leq 999,$ we find 581 primes. The smaller numbers are not the $x$ values, they are just the count of primes. I guess when the count $c$ is from $1 \leq c \leq 40$ we do have $x = c - 1,$ not with larger $c.$