I am aware that the theory of equivalence relations with infinitely many classes, all of which infinite, has quantifier elimination, as can be seen from the answer to this question. However, does the theory which consists only of the axioms stating that $E$ is reflexive, transitive, and symmetric, have quantifier elimination (in a first-order logic with equality)? I'm inclined to say no, but I don't really know how even to begin the proof either way. Any hint would be appreciated.
2026-03-25 07:43:53.1774424633
Does the theory of equivalence relations have quantifier elimination?
888 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LOGIC
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What is (mathematically) minimal computer architecture to run any software
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Determine the truth value and validity of the propositions given
- Is this a commonly known paradox?
- Help with Propositional Logic Proof
- Symbol for assignment of a truth-value?
- Find the truth value of... empty set?
- Do I need the axiom of choice to prove this statement?
- Prove that any truth function $f$ can be represented by a formula $φ$ in cnf by negating a formula in dnf
Related Questions in MODEL-THEORY
- What is the definition of 'constructible group'?
- Translate into first order logic: "$a, b, c$ are the lengths of the sides of a triangle"
- Existence of indiscernible set in model equivalent to another indiscernible set
- A ring embeds in a field iff every finitely generated sub-ring does it
- Graph with a vertex of infinite degree elementary equiv. with a graph with vertices of arbitrarily large finite degree
- What would be the function to make a formula false?
- Sufficient condition for isomorphism of $L$-structures when $L$ is relational
- Show that PA can prove the pigeon-hole principle
- Decidability and "truth value"
- Prove or disprove: $\exists x \forall y \,\,\varphi \models \forall y \exists x \,\ \varphi$
Related Questions in EQUIVALENCE-RELATIONS
- Number of subsets, relations etc of a set
- Number of possible equivalence relations
- Why is $p(z) = \frac{e^z}{1 + e^z} \color{red}{\equiv} \frac{1}{1 + e^{-z}}$ and not $=$?
- Simple question about relations
- Total number of equivalence class for a set
- Is this an equivalence relation and explaination?
- Partition of a set identified by a equivalence relation
- Define an equivalence relation on $\{ 1,2,3,4 \}^2$ by: (, )(, ) if ⋅ = ⋅ . How many equivalence classes are there?
- Prove that $\sum_{i=1}^n\lvert[a_i]\rvert$ is even iff $n$ is even
- Pertaining to the Cardinality of $A$ modulo $R$ for finite $A$.
Related Questions in QUANTIFIER-ELIMINATION
- How quantifier elimination works
- Proof concerning quantifier elimination and substructures
- Show that the theory of $ (\mathbb{Z}, s)$ has quantifier elimination.
- Complete theory with quantifier elimination has finite boolean algebra
- Quantificational formatting and going from using logic with words, to using it for math proofs
- How much arithmetic is required to formalize quantifier elimination in Presburger arithmetic?
- If $T$ admits quantifier elimination in $\mathcal{L}$, does it admit quantifier elimination in $\mathcal{L}(c)$?
- Why is quantifier elimination desirable for a given theory?
- Exercise 3.4.3 in David Marker's "Model Theory"
- Quantifier elimination exercise
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $X = \{a,b,c\}$ and let $E$ be the equivalence relation on $X$ with classes $\{a\}$ and $\{b,c\}$. Then $a$ and $b$ satisfy the same quantifier-free formulas in one free variable (the induced substructures on $\{a\}$ and $\{b\}$ are isomorphic). But $b$ satisfies the formula $\exists x\, [xEy\wedge x\neq y]$, while $a$ does not. So this formula is not equivalent to any quantifier-free formula.