Does the value of $(-37)^{1/33}$ exist? I am very much confused with this. In desmos it is giving a real value whereas on the other hand in Wolfram Alpha it is giving an imaginary value. So, please give me the right answer? I want to know who is correct? Wolfram Alpha or Desmos? In desmos the value is showing $-1.115$.
2026-04-05 22:05:33.1775426733
Does the value of $(-37)^{1/33}$ exist?
112 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in EXPONENTIATION
- exponential equation with different bases; no logarithms
- Is square root of $y^2$ for every $y>0,y\in\mathbb{R}$?
- Definite sum for $(1+a)^n$
- Fractional exponents definition and the additive law of exponents
- Fourth term in the expansion of $(1-2x)^{3/2}$
- Why is $\int_{0}^{t} e^{nt} \mathrm{\ dt} = \frac{1}{n} \left(e^{nt} - 1\right)$? [solved; notation is also faulty in the first place]
- Exponentiation property of the modulo operator
- When are $\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^c$ and $\frac{a^c}{b^c}$ equivalent?
- How can I rewrite expression to get log out of exponent
- Compare $2^{2016}$ and $10^{605}$ without a calculator
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I think this is a good question. Suppose you have a number (I'm being deliberately vague) satisfying $x = (-37)^{1/33}$. Using your exponent rules, this means $x^{33} = -37$, or equivalently $x^{33}+37 = 0$. This is a polynomial with degree $33$.
The fundamental theorem of algebra says that any polynomial of degree $d\geq 1$ has a root that is a complex number. It turns out that $x^{33} + 37$ will actually have $33$ many complex solutions. Let's find them!
You say that Desmos gives a real solution of $x \approx -1.115$. Let's call this root $\sqrt[33]{-37}$, the real 33rd root of $-37$. This is a valid solution. It turns out that every real number has real odd power roots (cube roots, fifth roots, etc.) This follows from the intermediate value theorem. Let's find the other 32 roots.
Suppose there was a number $\zeta\neq 1$ so that $\zeta^{33} = 1$. Then if I took $$(\zeta\sqrt[33]{-37})^{33} = (\zeta^{33})(\sqrt[33]{-37}^{33}) = (1)(-37) = -37$$ so $\zeta\sqrt[33]{-37}$ is another 33rd root of $-37$. Cool! In fact, we can take any power of $\zeta$ and the same calculation will hold (exercise for the OP!). Now let's unravel what's happening with $\zeta$.
We have $\zeta^{33} = 1$, so $\zeta^{33} - 1 = 0$. This is another polynomial (of degree $33$) having $\zeta$ as a root. It also has $1$ as a root, and it has $31$ more roots (all of the form $\zeta^k$ for $k = 2,\dots,32$; check that these are in fact also 33rd roots of $1$). These are the so-called $33$rd roots of unity (unity just means $1$).
Finally, if you are familiar with trigonometry or complex exponentials, you can show that one possible value for $\zeta$ is $e^{2\pi i/33}$ which is the same as $\cos(2\pi/33) + i\sin(2\pi/33)$. If you accept that $e^{2\pi i} = 1$ (Euler's identity), then it should be clear that $e^{2\pi i/33}$ is a $33$rd root of $1$. If you know De Moivre's formula, then you should show that $\cos(2\pi/33) + i\sin(2\pi/33)$ is also a $33$rd root of unity.
To wrap up my answer, this means that there are $33$ possible answers to $(-37)^{1/33}$ (or better $x^{33} + 37 = 0$), namely \begin{align*} x &= \zeta^k\sqrt[33]{-37} \\ &= (e^{2\pi i(k)}/33)\sqrt[33]{-37} \\ &= (\cos(2\pi j/33) + i\sin(2\pi k)/33)\sqrt[33]{-37},\;\;\;\text{for}\;\;\;k = 0,\dots,32. \end{align*}For some practice, see if you can explicitly write (without De Moivre or Euler's identity) the second, third, and fourth roots of $1$. If this is easy, try the sixth and eights roots as well.
Ultimately, this means that Desmos and Wolfram|Alpha are giving different correct answers (because there are more than one). As the other comments say, it is important to understand the limitations of your software, but I do not disparage the software at all. Using it and finding its limitations can be an excellent learning tool.