Does $x \in gl(V)$ semisimple lets us choose basis such that the matrix is diagonal? (Humphrey Lie Algebra text)

32 Views Asked by At

This is from Humphrey's Lie algebra text, page 17:

So Humphrey defines what is semisimple here: enter image description here

Now the next page explains why the Jordan decomposition is useful and he proves a useful result: enter image description here

Now the part that I am confused about is why are we allowed to choose a basis such that our matrix is diagonal? Because x being semisimple implies diagonalizability if our field is algebraically closed but I don't think we ever made that assumption here so why is this possible?

2

There are 2 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

The first paragraph of Chapter II says:

In Chapter I we looked at Lie algebras over an arbitrary field $\mathsf{F}$. Apart from introducing the basic notions and examples, we were able to prove only one substantial theorem (Engel’s Theorem). Virtually all of the remaining theory to be developed in this book will require the assumption that $\mathsf{F}$ have characteristic $0$. (Some of the exercises will indicate how counterexamples arise in prime characteristic.) Moreover, in order to have available the eigenvalues of $\operatorname{ad} x$ for arbitrary $x$ (not just for $\operatorname{ad} x$ nilpotent), we shall assume that $\mathsf{F}$ is algebraically closed, except where otherwise specified.

The section from which you clipped the second screenshot does relax the assumption that $\operatorname{char} \mathsf{F} = 0$, but as far as I can tell it is still assumed to be algebraically closed. In fact, given what precedes the assumption (after “Moreover...”), it seems that this is the main reason for making such an assumption.

2
On

The property that an endomorphism x is semisimple is determined by the induced endomorphism on $\bar{F}\otimes_F V$, where we write $\bar{F}$ for the algebraic closure of $F$. Thus Humphreys' argument actually works regardless of whether F is assumed to be algebraically closed or not: one can pass to $\bar{F}$ and then diagonalize x, and check that the induced basis of End(V) diagonalizes ad(x).