Doubt in the proof of Cauchy-Binet formula.

891 Views Asked by At

I have a doubt in the proof of the Cauchy-Binet formula:

enter image description here

Question:

In the colored portion.

I dont know how the sum multiplying $det(A(J'))$ become $$\sum_\sigma sgn(\sigma) b_{j'_{\tau(1)}1} b_{j'_{\tau(2)}2}\ldots b_{j'_{\tau(k)}k}$$

Help me in that step.

Thanks in advance.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

The key step that your probably missing is this one. The sum $$\sum_{j_1,j_2,...,j_k=1}^n\det(A(j_1,j_2,...,j_k))b_{j_1}b_{j_2}...b_{j_k}$$ is taken over all multi-indices, not just the ordered ones $j_1<j_2...<j_k$. So what the author is doing is decomposing the set of all muti-indices into those which are of the form $j_1<j_2...<j_k$ and the permutations of these. So we will fix any ordered multi-index in $J^{\prime}$, then sum over the permutations of this index and lastly sum the results over $J^{\prime}$.

So fix a multi-index $j^{\prime}_1<...<j^{\prime}_k$, and let $\sigma$ index the permutations of this index. We have $$\sum_{\sigma}\det(A(j_1,j_2,...,j_k))b_{j_1}b_{j_2}...b_{j_k}=\sum_{\sigma}sgn(\sigma)\det(A(j_1,j_2,...,j_k))sgn(\sigma)b_{j_1}b_{j_2}...b_{j_k}$$ Using the fact that $$sgn(\sigma)\det(A(j_1,j_2,...,j_k))=\det(A(j^{\prime}_1,j^{\prime}_2,...,j^{\prime}_k))$$ you are left with $$\sum_{\sigma}sgn(\sigma)\det(A(j_1,j_2,...,j_k))sgn(\sigma)b_{j_1}b_{j_2}...b_{j_k}=\det(A(j^{\prime}_1,j^{\prime}_2,...,j^{\prime}_k))\sum_{\sigma}sgn(\sigma)b_{j_1}b_{j_2}...b_{j_k}$$ Then use that $j_{i}=j^{\prime}_{\tau(i)}$ and your done.

By the way, if its any consolation, I think that this proof was written in a terribly confusing way myself.