I have a question about duality in Sobolev spaces .Let $\Omega $ be an open of $R$,Suppose that u$\in H_{0}^{2}(\Omega )\cap H^{3}(\Omega )$ and $v\in H_{0}^{2}(\Omega ).$ Is that this expression make a sens ? $\int\limits_\Omega {\partial _x^4u.vdx} $. Can i make a integration by part to get $\int\limits_\Omega {\partial _x^2u\partial _x^2vdx} $ ? Thank you ?
2026-04-04 22:36:24.1775342184
Dualty is Sobolev spaces
53 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SOBOLEV-SPACES
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- $\mbox{Cap}_p$-measurability
- If $u\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )$ is s.t. $\nabla u=0$ then $u$ is constant a.e.
- Weak formulation of Robin boundary condition problem
- Variational Formulation - inhomogeneous Neumann boundary
- Why the Sobolev space $W^{1,2}(M,N)$ weak-sequencially closed in $W^{1,2}(\mathbb R^K)$?
- Sobolev space $H^s(Q)$ is Hilbert
- Duhamel's principle for heat equation.
- How to define discrete Sobolev dual norm so that it can be computed?
- Weakly sequentially continuous maps
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
$$u \in H_{0}^{2}(\Omega )\cap H^{3}(\Omega ),v\in H_{0}^{2}(\Omega )$$
As you said by integration by parts we get
$$\int_\Omega {\partial _x^4u ~v~\text{d}x} =\underbrace{\big[\partial_x^3 u~ v\big]_{\partial \Omega}}_{=0, ~v\in H_0^2} – \int_\Omega \partial_x^3 u~ \partial_x v ~\text{d}x=-\underbrace{\big[\partial_x^2 u~ \partial_x v\big]_{\partial \Omega}}_{=0, ~v\in H_0^2}+\int_\Omega \partial_x^2 u~ \partial_x^2 v ~\text{d}x$$
and using Cauchy-Schwarz we get that this integral exists
$$\int_\Omega \partial_x^2 u~ \partial_x^2 v ~\text{d}x \leq ||u''||_2 ||v''||_2<\infty$$
since $u \in H^2$ and $v \in H^2$ and therefore by definition $u'' \in L^2(\Omega)$ and $v'' \in L^2(\Omega)$. The integral in between also exists since we can bound it by $||u'''||_2 ||v'||_2$.
But as you mentioned does the first integral really make sense? Only implicitly by the equality to the integral on the right hand side. But just by the assumption we can't say that the fourth weak derivative of $u$ exists.