Can anyone show me that both $\cos t$ and $\sin t$ are eigen signals. Here is a little bit background of eigen-function.
The output of a continuous-time, linear time-invariant system is denoted by $T\{z(t)\}$ where $x(t)$ is the input signal. A signal $z(t)$ is called eigen-signal of the system $T$ , when $T\{z(t)\} = \gamma z(t)$, where $\gamma$ is a complex number, in general, and is called an eigenvalue of $T$. EDIT: Suppose the impulse response of the system $T$ is real and even.
The output of the LTI system will be the convolution of its impulse response with the input (see). Since the impulse response of a Lyapunov stable LTI system is a finite sum of complex exponentials (see example 1 here), and the sin and cos functions may also be represented as a sum of complex exponentials (see), it is clear that the integrand in the convolution operation is also an exponential. The integral of an exponential is a scaling of that same exponential. Thus, an input with a sinusoidal (complex exponential) form yields an output also with a sinusoidal (complex exponential) form.
I have to argue with your T{z(t)} notation though, because in many cases T{sin(t)} = a*sin(t+b). The "phase shift" b cannot be ignored. Of course, this is just a notation issue, because generally speaking, your problem is supposing z(t) = a*e^(s*t) and T{z} will result in only a scaling of the complex amplitude of the phasor z(t). For example, T{z} could yield a*e^(b)*e^(s*t) = a*e^(s*t+b), i.e. a phase shift, while there is still a clear eigenvalue of e^b. Note that a, b, and s are all in general complex.
The fact that the LTI system is Lyapunov stable is also important. Without Lyapunov stability, it can have an impulse response of the form t*e^-t which would break this argument. I assume that whatever "even" means in regards to the impulse response is meant to handle that case.