The theorem and its proof is given below:
But I do not understand why $(\rho i)_{*} = $ identity implies that $\rho_{*}$ is onto. Could anyone explain this for me please?
The theorem and its proof is given below:
But I do not understand why $(\rho i)_{*} = $ identity implies that $\rho_{*}$ is onto. Could anyone explain this for me please?
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
