Let $X,Y,E$ be Banach spaces. We say that a continuous linear operator $T\in\mathcal{L}(X,Y)$ is $E$-strictly singular, and write $T\in\mathcal{SS}_E(X,Y)$, whenever it fails to fix a copy of $E$. More precisely, $T\in\mathcal{SS}_E(X,Y)$ whenever for each closed subspace $U\subseteq X$ satisfying $U\approx E$, the operator $T$ is not bounded below on $U$, i.e. for $\epsilon>0$ there is $u\in U$ such that $\|Tu\|<\epsilon\|u\|$.
We say that $T$ is non-$E$-factoring, and write $T\in\mathcal{M}_{\ell_p}(X,Y)$, whenever $Id_E$ fails to factor through $T$, i.e. whenever there are no $A\in\mathcal{L}(E,X)$ and $B\in\mathcal{L}(Y,E)$ such that $BTA=Id_E$, where $I_E\in\mathcal{L}(E)$ is the identity operator on $E$.
It is clear that we always have $\mathcal{SS}_E(X,Y)\subseteq\mathcal{M}_E(X,Y)$. I believe (but have not yet checked to be sure) that these classes coincide whenever $E=\ell_1$ or $E=c_0$. If $1<p<\infty$, we also have $\mathcal{SS}_{\ell_p}(L_p)=\mathcal{M}_{\ell_p}(L_p)$ and $\mathcal{SS}_{\ell_2}(L_p)=\mathcal{M}_{\ell_2}(L_p)$.
Question 1. Let $1<p<\infty$. Do there exist Banach spaces $X$ and $Y$ such that $\mathcal{SS}_{\ell_p}(X,Y)\neq\mathcal{M}_{\ell_p}(X,Y)$?
It is known that $\mathcal{SS}_{c_0}$ and $\mathcal{SS}_{\ell_p}$ are norm-closed operator ideals for $1\leq p<\infty$. I believe (but have not checked) that the same is true for $\mathcal{M}_{c_0}$ and $\mathcal{M}_{\ell_1}$. I believe (but have not checked) that $\mathcal{M}_{\ell_p}$ is also an operator ideal in the sense of Pietsch for $1<p<\infty$, but I do not know whether it is norm-closed.
Question 2. Let $1<p<\infty$. Do there exist Banach spaces $X$ and $Y$ such that $\mathcal{M}_{\ell_p}(X,Y)$ fails to be norm-closed in $\mathcal{L}(X,Y)$ (in the operator norm)?
An example satisfying Q2 would also satisfy Q1.
One last thing: Are there references for any of the "known" facts I mentioned above? For example, where is it proved that $\mathcal{SS}_{\ell_p}$ is a norm-closed operator ideal?
Thanks guys!
I think that it is still open whether $\mathscr{M}_{\ell_p}$ is closed under addition, hence it is not clear whether is coincides with $\mathscr{S\!\!S}_{\ell_p}$.
That $\mathscr{S\!\!S}_{c_0(\Gamma)}$ is a closed operator ideal (for any set $\Gamma$) is not too hard to show. See Proposition 3.13 in
That $\mathscr{S\!\!S}_E$ is a closed operator ideal for a minimal space $E$ follows from a variation of Kato's lemma; see Proposition 2.5 in