Following a discussion with a number theory professor, we arrived at the following question : Can we find an elliptic curve (short form : $y^2=x^3+ax+b$) with an identical number of points on two different finite fields: $GF(q)$ and $GF(q^r)$ with $q$ prime.
Looking at some brute force results, we found only one result : the elliptic curve defined by $y^2=x^3+2x+1$ with fields of order 3 and 9.
We only looked at first 100's primes $q$, with power up to 10 so far, but we cannot understand what's specific about this choice, and why is this the only solution we can find so far...
any idea? Any clue as how we could attack this problem?
Thanks
Edit : Using Weil conjecture, we can start with, $\forall q$, $\exists \alpha \in \mathbb{C}$ such that $\forall r$ : $$ \#E(\mathbb{F}_{q^r})= (q^r+1) - (\alpha^r+\bar{\alpha}^r) $$ with $\alpha$ and $\bar{\alpha}$ conjugate, such that $\mid\alpha\mid=\sqrt{q}$
In characteristics two and three you don't have the short Weierstrass form, and this leaves room for more examples. Below there are examples of
Consider the elliptic curve $$ y^2+y=x^3+x $$ defined over $\Bbb{F}_2$. It is relatively easy to see that all the solutions with $x,y\in\Bbb{F}_4$ actually have $x,y\in\Bbb{F}_2$. Basically because $y^2+y=0$ when $y\in \Bbb{F}_2$, and $y^2+y=1$ when $y\in\Bbb{F}_4\setminus \Bbb{F}_2$, but $x^3+x\neq0,1$ when $x\in\Bbb{F}_4\setminus\Bbb{F}_2$.
An explanation in terms of Hasse-Weil formula is to observe that $\# E(\Bbb{F}_2)=5$, Every point $(x,y)\in\Bbb{F}_2\times\Bbb{F}_2$ is a solution, and then we have the point at infinity. Therefore $$ \alpha+\overline{\alpha}=\alpha+\frac2\alpha=-2. $$ Squaring this equation gives $$ \alpha^2+\overline{\alpha^2}=\alpha^2+\frac4{\alpha^2}=(\alpha+\frac2\alpha)^2-4=(-2)^2-4=0. $$ Therefore $\# E(\Bbb{F}_4)=4+1-0=5=\# E(\Bbb{F}_2).$
Other characteristic two examples are the curves $$ y^2+xy=x^3+1 $$ and $$ y^2+xy=x^3+x. $$ Both have four points over $\Bbb{F}_2$ but no other solutions over $\Bbb{F}_8$.
From $\#E(\Bbb{F}_2)=4$ we can solve $\alpha=(-1+i\sqrt7)/2$. Then $\alpha^3=(5-i\sqrt7)/2$ and thus, by Hasse-Weil $$ \# E(\Bbb{F}_8)=8+1-(\alpha^3+\overline{\alpha^3})=8+1-5=4. $$ An alternative explanation comes from the fact that the trace of $(x+\dfrac1x)$ is equal to $1$ for all $x\in\Bbb{F}_8\setminus\Bbb{F}_2$. The solvability criterion for having a solution $y\in\Bbb{F}_8$ would dictate this trace to vanish. Hence, no new points.
Yet another characteristic two example.
Consider the curve $$y^2+y=x^3.$$ With $x$ ranging over the field $\Bbb{F}_4$ we have $x^3\in\Bbb{F}_2$, therefore two solutions for $y$ to each $x$ and therefore nine points altogether. In this maximal case we must have $\alpha=\overline{\alpha}=-2$. But, then $\alpha^2=\overline{\alpha}^2=4$, so over the field $\Bbb{F}_{16}$ we have $16+1-(\alpha^2+\overline{\alpha}^2)=9$ points also. The trace condition for solvability of a quadratic leads to the same conclusion. After all, the cube of an element $x\in\Bbb{F}_{16}\setminus\Bbb{F}_4$ is of order five, and those all have trace $1$.