What is meant when someone discusses an epsilon neighborhood of $\mathbb{Q}$?. Naturally the rationals are dense in $[0,1]$, so what is the epsilon neighborhood? More importantly, what does the following series add up to, $$\sum_{\substack{ 0 \leq x \leq 1, \\ x\in\mathbb{Q} }} \epsilon (x),$$ where $\epsilon(x)$ denotes the length of the interval $( x - \frac{\epsilon}{2}, x + \frac{\epsilon}{2})$.
2026-04-07 02:51:32.1775530292
Epsilon Neighborhoods of the Rationals
502 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in ANALYSIS
- Analytical solution of a nonlinear ordinary differential equation
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Show that $d:\mathbb{C}\times\mathbb{C}\rightarrow[0,\infty[$ is a metric on $\mathbb{C}$.
- conformal mapping and rational function
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Proving whether function-series $f_n(x) = \frac{(-1)^nx}n$
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Proving smoothness for a sequence of functions.
- How to prove that $E_P(\frac{dQ}{dP}|\mathcal{G})$ is not equal to $0$
- Integral of ratio of polynomial
Related Questions in RATIONAL-NUMBERS
- What is the smallest integer $N>2$, such that $x^5+y^5 = N$ has a rational solution?
- I don't understand why my college algebra book is picking when to multiply factors
- Non-galois real extensions of $\mathbb Q$
- A variation of the argument to prove that $\{m/n:n \text{ is odd },n,m \in \mathbb{Z}\}$ is a PID
- Almost have a group law: $(x,y)*(a,b) = (xa + yb, xb + ya)$ with rational components.
- When are $\alpha$ and $\cos\alpha$ both rational?
- What is the decimal form of 1/299,792,458
- Proving that the sequence $\{\frac{3n+5}{2n+6}\}$ is Cauchy.
- Is this a valid proof? If $a$ and $b$ are rational, $a^b$ is rational.
- What is the identity element for the subgroup $H=\{a+b\sqrt{2}:a,b\in\mathbb{Q},\text{$a$ and $b$ are not both zero}\}$ of the group $\mathbb{R}^*$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It's hard to interpret your question.
If it is interpreted as a sum then (if $\epsilon$ is only allowed to be rational and positive - this is needed for the normal method of infinite series which concerns itself with countable sets), then it diverges. This can be seen easily. Take $x=\frac{1}{2}$ and consider some list of rational epsilon with $\epsilon\in (1/2,1)$. There are a countably infinite number of these $\epsilon$ and so the sum of them all, since they're all greater than $1/2$, is also infinite. Since the series is a positive one, this shows that the whole series of all $x$ and $\epsilon$ considerable diverges.
If it's interpreted as a union of all $N_\epsilon (x)$ where $x\in [0,1]$, $x\in \mathbb{Q}$, $\epsilon \in \mathbb{R}$, and $N_\epsilon (x)\subset [0,1]$, it equals $(0,1)$.* This is because the infinite union of open sets is also open. Therefore the union is open. So if $0$ were an element of the union, you would also include elements less than $0$, but we already supposed no interval/neighborhood contains elements less than zero. (same with $1$). "The contradiction establishes the theorem." ^^
*($N_\epsilon(x)$ is "the neighborhood radius epsilon around x". Note that it varies by a factor of 2 from your original post, but that the definitions leave the problem essentially the same. I'm just treating $\epsilon$ as a radius instead of a diameter of the neighborhood.)
(please comment to let me know if I interpreted your question correctly. The second one is probably what your teacher meant? I find it the most interesting, at least.)