Equivalence relation - reflexity

60 Views Asked by At

I need to prove that relation is an equivalence relation. Equivalence relation means it satisfies reflexity, symmetry, and transitivity.

If I was given an set of numbers S=(-1,1) and for example for -(1/2) relation is not reflexive, but for 1/2 it is reflexive. Does that mean that in the end relation is not reflexive, because it's not reflexive for all numbers from that set?

Thank you!

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On

As noted in the comments, reflexivity has to hold for all elements of the set of concern. More precisely, let $R$ be a relation on $S$. Then, for all $s \in S$, we must have $(s,s) \in R$ (or $sRs$ depending on your notation of preference). We might write this as $\forall s \in S, (s,s) \in R$.

It only takes a single counterexample to bring the entire thing toppling down as a result. It has to hold for literally everything in $S$ or it's not reflexive.