Equivalent definition of supremum

252 Views Asked by At

My textbook gives two different definitions for the supremum, but I've been unable to prove them.

Definition 1
$E \subset \mathbb{R}$ is a set of real numbers.
$\alpha$ :=sup $E$ $\overset {\mathrm{def}} {\Leftrightarrow} $
(1) $\forall x \in E$ , $x \leq \alpha$
(2) If $\gamma < \alpha$ , $\exists x \in E$ : $\gamma < x $

Definition 2
$E \subset \mathbb{R}$ is a set of real numbers.
$\alpha$ :=sup $E$ $\overset {\mathrm{def}} {\Leftrightarrow} $
(1) $\forall x \in E$ , $x \leq \alpha$
(2) $\forall \varepsilon >0 $, $\exists x \in E$ : $\alpha-\varepsilon<x$

Please tell me the proof Definition 1 $\iff$ Definition 2.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

2
On

We want to show that

$\forall\gamma < \alpha$ , $\exists x \in E$ : $\gamma < x $

and

$\forall \varepsilon >0 $, $\exists x \in E$ : $\alpha-\varepsilon<x$

are equivalent.

Note that

$\gamma < \alpha\iff \alpha-\gamma>0$

and

$\gamma < x \iff \alpha-(\alpha-\gamma)< x$

So, the first proposition is equivalent to

$\forall \alpha-\gamma>0$, $\exists x \in E$ : $\alpha-(\alpha-\gamma)< x$

Now, it is enought to use the change of variable property, in this case $\varepsilon=\alpha-\gamma$. Therefore

$\forall \varepsilon >0 $, $\exists x \in E$ : $\alpha-\varepsilon<x$