Suppose $f(x)$ is defined as $$f(x) =\begin{cases} 1 & \text{ if } x= (a+b)/2 \\ 0 & \text{ otherwise.} \end{cases} $$ where $f$ is real valued function on $I = [a,b]$. I want to compute the Riemann Integral for this function on the interval $I$. To compute the Riemann Integral we need to compute upper and Lower Integral. $$\underline{\int_{a}^{b}} f dx = \sup_P \left\{\sum_{k=1}^n \mid I_k\mid \inf_{x\in I_k} f(x)\right\} $$ $ \forall x \in [a,b] \quad \inf_{x} =0 $ $$\underline{\int_{a}^{b}} f dx = 0$$ Let's compute Upper Reimann Integral $$\overline{\int_{a}^{b}} f dx = \inf_P \left\{\sum_{k=1}^n \mid I_k\mid \sup_{x\in I_k} f(x)\right\}$$ $if \quad x= (a+b)/2 $ , $\exists I_j $ for which $sup_{x\in I_j} =1$ , $x= (a+b)/2 \in I_j$ $$\overline{\int_{a}^{b}} f dx = \mid I_j \mid $$ Let there are in $n$ partition, $$\mid I_j \mid = \frac {\mid b-a \mid} n $$ as $n \rightarrow \infty$ , $\mid I_j \mid = 0$ $$\overline{\int_{a}^{b}} f dx = 0$$ $$\overline{\int_{a}^{b}} f dx = \underline{\int_{a}^{b}} f dx = \int_{a}^{b} f dx =0$$ If there are $m$ values where $f(x) =1$ then $m \frac {\mid b-a \mid} n$ also tends to zero. Therefore, Riemann integral is equal to zero even if there are more than one different value of function at a single point. Is this correct reasoning to compute Riemann integral of $f(x)$?
2026-04-07 05:03:27.1775538207
Evaluating Riemann Integral with finitely many different values of function at different points
62 Views Asked by user921076 https://math.techqa.club/user/user921076/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in RIEMANN-INTEGRATION
- Riemann Integrability of a function and its reciprocal
- How to evaluate a Riemann (Darboux?) integral?
- Reimann-Stieltjes Integral and Expectation for Discrete Random Variable
- Hint required : Why is the integral $\int_0^x \frac{\sin(t)}{1+t}\mathrm{d}t$ positive?
- Method for evaluating Darboux integrals by a sequence of partitions?
- Proof verification: showing that $f(x) = \begin{cases}1, & \text{if $x = 0$} \\0,&\text{if $x \ne 0$}\end{cases}$ is Riemann integrable?
- prove a function is integrable not just with limits
- Intervals where $f$ is Riemann integrable?
- Understanding extended Riemann integral in Munkres.
- Lebesgue-integrating a non-Riemann integrable function
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It is a bit overcomplicated, but yes. Basically it is like this: A finite amount of points can be enclosed by a finite amount of intervals with arbitrarily small length. Thus (since $f$ is bounded) follows that they do not affect the riemann integral at all. Even countably many points can be enclosed in such a way, that the sum of the lengths of the intervals is arbitrarily small.