Thm: If every finite subset of $\Gamma$ is consistent then $\Gamma$ is consistent.
My notes claims that it can be implied from compactness of $\vdash$. Meaning: If $\Gamma \vdash A$ then there's a finite subset $\Delta\in\Gamma$ such that $\Delta\vdash A$.
I don't see how it explains the theorem above.
I'd be glad for an explanation.
Suppose to the contrary that $\Gamma$ is not consistent. Then there is a sentence $\varphi$ such that $(\varphi \land \lnot\varphi)$ is a theorem of $\Gamma$. Then by Compactness $(\varphi \land \lnot\varphi)$ is provable from some finite subset $\Delta$ of $\Gamma$. It follows that some finite subset of $\Gamma$ is not consistent.