This bothers me for a while:
Proof $a = b$ $$a=b$$ $$b=a$$ $$a+b=b+a$$ $$a+b=a+b$$ $$0 = 0$$
This looks like a proof for $a=b$, but it shouldn't work like this. But i can't put my finger on why it's wrong.
This bothers me for a while:
Proof $a = b$ $$a=b$$ $$b=a$$ $$a+b=b+a$$ $$a+b=a+b$$ $$0 = 0$$
This looks like a proof for $a=b$, but it shouldn't work like this. But i can't put my finger on why it's wrong.
On
There's nothing wrong with this. You started by assuming that $a=b$, so your proof only holds if, indeed, $a$ is equal to $b$.
On
If you reverse the steps, there is no viable rule or theory that lets you go from $$a+b=b+a$$ to $$b=a$$
This merely proves that if $a=b$ then $0=0$. Try proving it the other way around and you'll see that you can't reverse the steps.