An algebraic group over a field $K$ is called a split algebraic group if it has a Borel subgroup that has a composition series such that all the composition factors are isomorphic to either the additive group of $K$ or the multiplicative group of $K$. Are there some examples of non-split algebraic groups? Thank you very much.
2026-03-29 10:28:51.1774780131
Examples of non-split algebraic groups.
1.5k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
Take any non-split (connected) torus $T/k$. Clearly $T$ itself is the only Borel in $T$ and the composition series is just $T$ itself. Thus, $T$ is split if and only if $T\cong\mathbf{G}_m^k$. But there are lots of examples of tori not isomorphic to the multiplicative group. The most canonical examples I can think of are:
In general, one can classify the non-split tori over $K$ as the non-trivial elements of
$$H^1(G_K,\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{Z}))=\mathrm{Hom}_\text{cont.}(G_K,\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{Z}))$$
Or, said differently, the tori over $K$ correspond to finitely generated free $\mathbb{Z}$-modules with a continuous action of $G_K$ (for the discrete topology on the group).
This makes the '$\mathrm{Res}$' above seem more obvious. Namely, if we have a finite extension $L/K$ then what's a natural way of going from a $G_L$-representation $\rho:G_L\to\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{Z})$ to a representation $\rho:G_K\to\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{Z})$? By induction! Namely, if $M$ is our free $\mathbb{Z}$-representation of $G_L$ then $\mathrm{Ind}_{G_L}^{G_K} M$ gives a representation of $G_K$. If the torus corresponding to $M$ is $T$ then the torus corresponding to $\mathrm{Ind}_{G_L}^{G_K}M$ is $\mathrm{Res}_{L/K}T$.
EDIT: The torus $U(1)/\mathbb{R}$ is given by
$$U(1)=\left\{\begin{pmatrix}a & b\\ -b & a\end{pmatrix}:a^2+b^2=1\right\}\subseteq\mathrm{GL}_{2,\mathbb{R}}$$
This is not isomorphic to $\mathbf{G}_{m,\mathbb{R}}$. For instance, $U(1)(\mathbb{R})$ is just the unit circle $S^1$ which has lots of torsion elements, but $\mathbb{R}^\times$ has only two torsion elements. That said, $U(1)$ is a commutative connected algebraic group, and so is its only Borel is itself. This shows that $U(1)$ is not split in your definition.
I leave it as an exercise to check that $U(1)_\mathbb{C}\cong\mathbf{G}_{m,\mathbb{C}}$ (let me know if you any difficulties).