What are some examples of $n$-dimensional topological manifolds $M$ (possibly with boundary), which can be written as a quotient $\mathbb{R}^d/G$ for some topological group acting on $\mathbb{R}^d$?
2026-02-23 15:08:14.1771859294
Examples: (Symmetric) Quotients of Euclidean Space
250 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REFERENCE-REQUEST
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Random variables in integrals, how to analyze?
- Abstract Algebra Preparation
- Definition of matrix valued smooth function
- CLT for Martingales
- Almost locality of cubic spline interpolation
- Identify sequences from OEIS or the literature, or find examples of odd integers $n\geq 1$ satisfying these equations related to odd perfect numbers
- property of Lebesgue measure involving small intervals
Related Questions in LIE-GROUPS
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- homomorphism between unitary groups
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Is it true that if a Lie group act trivially on an open subset of a manifold the action of the group is trivial (on the whole manifold)?
- Find non-zero real numbers $a,b,c,d$ such that $a^2+c^2=b^2+d^2$ and $ab+cd=0$.
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in SYMMETRIC-SPACES
- What do radially symmetric functions on a Riemannian symmetric space look like?
- Which groups $H$ act transitively on a noncompact symmetric space $G/K$?
- If $H$ acts transitively on $G/K$, does it contain a copy of $AN$?
- What are the simply-connected non-compact irreducible symmetric spaces?
- references for the quotient of a product of hyperbolic 2- and 3- spaces by $SL_2$ over a number ring
- Parameterization Of Grassmannian
- Ricci flat symmetric spaces are flat?
- Relationship between distances on homogeneous spaces and their Lie groups
- Isometry group of Riemannian symmetric spaces and Lie groups
- Dominant Weyl chamber and co-adjoint orbit for Riemann symmetric pair
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I will interpret your question as asking about manifolds which are quotients of $R^d$ by proper continuous actions of topological groups.
First of all, if $M$ is a connected manifold and $p: \tilde M\to M$ is the universal covering then the discrete group $G=\pi_1(M)$ acts properly on $\tilde M$ by deck-transformations of $p$ so that $M= \tilde M/G$.
Thus, you obtain some easy examples: Manifolds whose universal cover is homeomorphic to ${\mathbb R}^d$, e.g. tori $T^d$. Also, if $S$ is a connected surface not homeomorphic to $S^2$ or ${\mathbb R} P^2$, then the universal cover of $S$ is homeomorphic to ${\mathbb R}^2$: Once can derive this from the Uniformization Theorem. This gives you more examples by taking products of surfaces and circles. With a bit more work, you also prove that if $$ F\to M\to B $$ is a fiber bundle, where the fiber and base ($F$ and $B$) have universal covers homeomorphic to ${\mathbb R}^k, {\mathbb R}^n$ respectively, then the universal cover $\tilde M$ of $M$ is homeomorphic to ${\mathbb R}^{n+k}$: This is because the fiber bundle above lifts to a fiber bundle of universal covers: $$ \tilde F\to \tilde M\to \tilde B $$ and the latter is trivial since $\tilde B$ is contractible.
Conjecture. Every connected topological manifold $M^m$ (possibly with boundary) is homeomorphic to the quotient of some ${\mathbb R}^d$ ($d=m$ or $d=m+1$) by a proper continuous group action of a topological group.
I will prove this conjecture (when $d=m$) in the case of (arbitrary) surfaces and compact 3-manifolds ($m=3$). There is a strategy for proving the conjecture in higher dimensions, assuming that $M$ is compact and triangulated (the proof I have in mind may need $m+1$ instead of $m$ and a nondiscrete topological group $G$). I am not sure about topological manifolds.
Proof. In order to keep the discussion reasonably short, I will assume that $\partial M=\emptyset$.
If $M$ is a noncompact surface (without boundary), the universal cover of $M$ is homeomorphic to ${\mathbb R}^2$ and we are done. The same for closed (compact, with empty boundary) surfaces different from $S^2$ and ${\mathbb R} P^2$.
To represent $S^2$ as the quotient of the plane, start with a square $Q\subset {\mathbb R}^2$ and let $\Gamma$ denote the group of Euclidean isometries generated by reflections $\tau_1,...,\tau_4$ in the consecutive edges of $Q$. Then ${\mathbb R}^2/\Gamma$ is naturally homeomorphic to $Q$ (since every $\Gamma$-orbit in ${\mathbb R}^2$ intersects $Q$ exactly once). Let $G_1< \Gamma$ denote the index 2 subgroup consisting of orientation-preserving isometries. Then ${\mathbb R}^2/G_1$ is homeomorphic to $S^2$: You see this by taking the union $D$ of $Q$ and $Q'=\tau_1(Q)$ and checking the identification pattern on the boundary of $D$ given by the rotations $\tau_1 \circ \tau_i, i=1,2,3$. The key fact to keep in mind is that while $\Gamma$ (and, hence, its subgroups) acts properly on the plane, it does not act freely on the plane, so the action of $G_1$ is not by covering transformations (the universal cover of $S^2$, of course, is not ${\mathbb R}^2$). In order to get ${\mathbb R}P^2$ as the quotient, let $\sigma$ denote the unique reflection $\ne \tau_1$ and preserving $D$. Define the group $G_2$ generated by $G_1$ and the composition $\tau_1\circ \tau_2\circ \sigma$. The group $G_2$ contains $G_1$ as an index 2 subgroup and one verifies that $R^2/G_2$ is homeomorphic to ${\mathbb R}P^2$.
In order to understand what is really going on here, it is better to use the language of orbifolds. The best reference I know is:
Scott, Peter, The geometries of 3-manifolds, Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 15, 401-487 (1983). ZBL0561.57001.
What I am using is that both $S^2$ and ${\mathbb R}P^2$ appear as underlying spaces or parabolic (Euclidean) orbifolds: For $S^2$ I am placing four elliptic points of order 2 on the sphere and for ${\mathbb R}P^2$ I am placing two elliptic/cone points of order 2 on ${\mathbb R}P^2$. This creates, respectively, parabolic orbifolds ${\mathcal O}_1$ and ${\mathcal O}_2$ with respective fundamental groups isomorphic to $G_1, G_2$: The Euclidean plane on which $G_1, G_2$ are acting serves as the universal covering space (in the orbifold sense!) of both orbifolds. The groups $G_1, G_2$ are acting on the plane as the groups of covering transformations (again, in the orbifolds sense!), hence, fixed points are allowed (and even required). I could have used different parabolic or even hyperbolic orbifold structures with the underlying spaces $S^2$ and ${\mathbb R}P^2$ to the same effect. In the latter case, the universal covering space (as a metric space) would be the hyperbolic plane.
The latter generalizes to dimension 3. I will use a theorem mostly due to Thurston:
Theorem. Let $M$ be a closed oriented connected 3-manifold. Then there exists a link (even a knot) $L\subset M$ such that placing a suitable orbifold data at $L$, one obtains a hyperbolic orbifold ${\mathcal O}$ with the underlying space $M$ and the singular locus $L$.
You can find proofs for instance in
Myers, Robert, Simple knots in compact, orientable 3-manifolds, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 273, 75-91 (1982). ZBL0508.57008.
Brooks, Robert, A construction of metrics of negative Ricci curvature, J. Differ. Geom. 29, No. 1, 85-94 (1989). ZBL0628.53043.
The proof in the second paper has a chance to generalize in higher dimensions, but one needs to weaken negative curvature to nonpositive curvature (in suitable sense).
The result also holds for compact manifolds with boundary (one needs to put suitable "boundary reflectors" on $\partial M$) and non-orientable 3-manifolds.
Now, given this, let $G=\pi_1({\mathcal O})$ be the orbifold-fundamental group of ${\mathcal O}$. The property that ${\mathcal O}$ is hyperbolic means that $G$ acts isometrically and properly on the hyperbolic 3-space ${\mathbb H}^3$ so that the quotient-orbifold ${\mathbb H}^3/G$ is isomorphic (as an orbifold) to ${\mathcal O}$. In particular, this quotient, regarded as a topological space, is homeomorphic to $M$.