Exercise 24.12 in Humphrey's Lie algebra book : Application of Steinberg's formula

248 Views Asked by At

I'm working on the following exercise (Exercise 24.12) in Humphrey's book Introduction to Lie algebras and representation theory.

My question is how to solve the following exercise:

Exercise: Deduce from Steinberg's formula that the only possible $\lambda \in \Lambda^{+}$ for which $V(\lambda)$ can occur as a summand of $V(\lambda^{\prime}) \otimes V(\lambda^{\prime\prime})$ are those of the form $\mu + \lambda^{\prime\prime}$, where $\mu \in \Pi(\lambda^{\prime})$. .....

Notation issue: Here we are talking about representations of a semisimple Lie algebra $L$ with fixed maximal toral subalgebra $H$ (or say CSA $H$) and corresponding root system $\Phi$ with a fixed base (or say positive system) $\Delta$. $\mathcal{W}$ is the Weyl group of $(\Phi, \Delta)$. $\lambda$ is a dominant integral weight in $H^{\ast}$, $V(\lambda)$ is the irreducible highest weight representation of highest weight $\lambda$ (i.e. the irreducible quotient of the Verma module $Z(\lambda)$). Here $\Pi(\lambda) = \Pi(V(\lambda))$ is the set of all weights of $V(\lambda)$

Steinberg's formula: Let $\lambda^{\prime}, \lambda^{\prime\prime} \in \Lambda^{+}$. Then the number of times $V(\lambda)$, $\lambda \in \Lambda^{+}$, occurs in $V(\lambda^{\prime}) \otimes V(\lambda^{\prime\prime})$ is given by the formula $$ \sum_{\sigma, \tau \in \mathcal{W}} \mathrm{sn}(\sigma \tau) p(\lambda + 2\delta - \sigma(\lambda^{\prime} + \delta)-\tau(\lambda^{\prime\prime} + \delta)). $$ where $p(\lambda)$ is the number of of sets of nonnegative integers $\{k_{\alpha}, \alpha > 0 \}$ for which $-\lambda = \sum_{\alpha > 0} k_{\alpha} \alpha$ and $\mathrm{sn}(\sigma) := (-1)^{\ell(\sigma)}$, here $\ell$ is the length function on the Weyl group $\mathcal{W}$.

My attempts: As usual and as what I'm supposed to do, I shall write my attempts, but I just repeat the definition again and again but failed. This exercise carried on asking to decompose $V(1,3) \otimes V(4,4)$ in $\mathsf{A}_2$ with a previous exercise and I managed to do this. But I still cannot prove the part of this exercise quoted above. :(

Thank you all for commenting and answering! :)