Motivation: I'm trying to prove the following
Suppose $X,Y$ are normed spaces and $X$ is nontrivial, then if $L(X,Y)$, the space of bounded linear operators endowed with the usual operator norm, is a Banach space, so is $Y$.
I suppose there must be some canonical proofs for this result, but before looking at them, I want to make one myself. And here it goes:
Given a Hamel basis $\{x_i\}$ of $X$, find one $x_i$ such that the corresponding coordinate functional $f$ is continuous (if existing). Then for any Cauchy sequence $\{y_n\}\subset Y$, define $g_n:=y_nf\in L(X,Y)$. Then, it is not hard to show that $\{g_n\}$ is Cauchy in $L(X,Y)$, and as a result $y_n\to (\lim g_n)(x_i)$.
So the only trouble is the existence of such a $f$. Of course, I know that I can never expect all of them to be continuous, but does there exist at least a continuous one, for each $X$ and each its Hamel basis?
EDIT As commented by @Marko, far less is actually required to prove the original theorem: any bounded functional $f$ which attains $1$ at some $x\ne 0$ is ok (existence by Hahn Banach Extension Theorem). However, I'm still curious to know about the existence of continuous coordinate functionals on a general Hamel basis.
That's a good question and I had never thought about it. This is what I managed to show:
If you are allowed to change the basis, there is a very straightforward positive answer:
But you want to check whether this property hold for every basis. I believe the answer is negative in this case. Here is my attempt:
You can find a proof of Lemma 1, here. We need one more Lemma which is based on something you wrote at a previous question of yours (it was a clever idea indeed!). I omit the proof because I think it is relatively easy:
With these Lemmas we can show that
Of course in a finite dimensional space you can't find any dense Hamel bases, so the previous argument doesn't work. After all, in finite dimensional spaces all of the coordinate functionals are bounded.