Let $f:(0,\pi)\times \mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a function in $C^1$ such that $$f(x,u(x))\geq h(x),\quad\text{for a certain}\quad h\in L^1((0,\pi)).\quad (1)$$ I want to show that $$J(u):=\int_0^\pi \frac{u'^2(x)}{2}+c\frac{u^2(x)}{2}+f(x,u(x))\ dx$$ has a minimiser in $H=\{u\in C^1((a,b))\cap C^2((a,b)):\quad u(0)=u(\pi)=0\}$, for every $c>-1$. What I've done so far: Let $$F(x,u(x))=c\frac{u^2(x)}{2}+f(x,u(x)).$$ By $(1)$, we can say that $F$ is lower bounded and therefore $F(x,u(x))\geq m$, for some $m\in\mathbb{R}$. Let $(u_n)$ be a minimising sequence of $J$, then, for some $L\in\mathbb{R}$, $J(u_n)\leq L$. Hence $$\frac{1}{2}\int_0^\pi u'^2_n(x)dx \leq L-\int_0^\pi F(x, u_n(x))\leq L-m|\pi-0|=L-m\pi.$$ We know that $\lVert u\rVert_{L^2}:=\int_Iu'^2(x)\ dx$ is a norm, therefore $(u_n)$ is bounded and, as we are working on a Hilbert space, it has a weakly convergent subsequence. Let that limit be $u_0$ (on the weak topology). By a Lemma, we have $$J(u_0)\leq \lim\inf J(u_n).$$ Hence $u_0$ is a minimiser of $J$. For every $\phi\in C_c^\infty((0,\pi))$ we have, by an argument of classic methods on calculus of variations, that $$\frac{d}{dt}(J(u_0+t\phi))_{t=0}=0.$$ I simplified this and got $$\int_0^\pi u'_0\phi'\ dx=-\int_0^\pi (cu_0+f_{u_0}(x,u_0))\phi\ dx,$$ which means $u'_0$ has a weak derivative $u''_0=cu_0+f_{u_0}(x,u_0)$. By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus for the weak derivative, we can write $$u'_0(x)=u'_0(y)+\int_x^ycu_0+f_{u_0}(t,u_0)\ dt,$$ and this assures $u_0\in C^1((a,b))\cap C^2((a,b))$. My questions are: why does $c$ has to be greater than $-1$?; is this reasoning correct? There is a hint for this problem: $$\int_0^\pi u'^2(x)\ dx \geq \int_0^\pi u^2(x)\ dx,$$ but I don't know where to use it. Any help on this? Thanks in advance.
2026-03-30 07:07:56.1774854476
Existence of minimal solution in $C^1((a,b))\cap C^2((a,b))$
60 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in CALCULUS-OF-VARIATIONS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Weak formulation of Robin boundary condition problem
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- Variational Formulation - inhomogeneous Neumann boundary
- Relationship between Training Neural Networks and Calculus of Variations
- How to prove a Minimal Surface minimizes Surface Tension
- Derive the Euler–Lagrange equation for a functional a single variable with higher derivatives.
- Does the covariant derivative commute with the variational derivative?
- Derivative of a functional w.r.t. a single point?
- calculus of variations with double integral textbook?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The general approach is mostly correct, but your proof of coercivity is not. In particular the following assertion is incorrect:
This is only true if $c \geq 0,$ but the question specifies that $c$ may be negative. Instead if you use the given hint you can show that for $u \in H,$
$$ J(u) \geq \frac{(1+c)}2\int_0^{\pi} u(x)^2 \,\mathrm{d}x + \int_0^{\pi} h(x) \,\mathrm{d}x. $$
Now crucially if $c > -1,$ we have $1+c > 0.$ Therefore if $(u_n) \subset H$ is a minimising sequence for $J(\cdot),$ we have $J(u_n) \leq L$ for all $n$ and hence we can bound $$ \int_0^{\pi} u_n(x)^2 \,\mathrm{d}x \leq \frac{2L}{1+c} J(u_n) + 2\int_0^{\pi} |h(x)| \,\mathrm{d}x := 2M < \infty. $$
Therefore $(u_n)$ is uniformly bounded in $L^2.$ Now you can argue similarly as you did to show that
$$ \frac12\int_0^{\pi} u'(x)^2 \,\mathrm{d}x \leq L + |c|M + \int_0^{\pi} |h(x)| \,\mathrm{d}x, $$
and proceed the same way.
To see why some condition on $c$ is necessary, consider the case then $c < -1$ and $f = 0.$ Then if we take $u_k(x) = k\sin(x)$ for $k$ an integer we have
$$ J(u_k) = \frac{k}2 \int_0^{\pi} \cos^2(x) + c\sin^2(x) \,\mathrm{d}x = k \pi (1+c) < 0. $$
Now as $k \to \infty$ we have $J(u_k) \to -\infty,$ so the functional is not bounded from below.
Added later: For the critical case $c=-1,$ existence can fail for certain $f.$ For instance consider
$$ f(x,z) = f(z) = \frac{1}{1+z^2}. $$
Then $f(z) >0$ everywhere, and $f(z) \to 0$ as $u \to \pm\infty.$ Hence using the given inequality and since $c=-1$ we have
$$ J(u) > 0 $$
for all $u \in H.$ To see this is strict, observe that the equality case of Wirtinger's inequality asserts that if $u \in H$ and
$$ \int_0^{\pi} u'(x)^2 \,\mathrm{d}x = \int_0^{\pi} u(x)^2 \,\mathrm{d}x,$$
then $u(x) = a \sin(x + b)$ for constants $a,b.$ However in this case we have
$$ J(u) = \int_0^{\pi} f\left( a \sin x \right) \,\mathrm{d}x = \int_0^{\pi} \frac1{1+a^2 \sin(x)^2} \,\mathrm{d}x > 0. $$
Now if we take $u_k(x) = k \sin(x),$ then $u_k \in H$ and we have $f(u_k) \to 0$ pointwise on $(0,\pi)$ and $|f(u_k)| \leq 1$ on $[0,\pi].$ Hence by the dominated convergence theorem we have $$ J(u_k) = \int_0^{\pi} \frac1{1+k^2\sin(x)^2} \,\mathrm{d}x \to 0 $$ as $k \to \infty.$ Hence $J(\cdot)$ does not admit a minimum.