Why is the second part where the quantifiers are interchanged false? Is there a concrete example for this?
Yes. The second statement reads "there exists a natural number $m$ such that for all other natural numbers $n$, $m >n$". Clearly this is false.
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
Yes. The second statement reads "there exists a natural number $m$ such that for all other natural numbers $n$, $m >n$". Clearly this is false.