Given a real number number $n$, find a partition whose product is least / max. I.e: $n=a_1+a_2+a_3+ \cdots+a_m$ (Here $m$ is a variable as well)
What can the maximum/minimum value of $a_1a_2a_3\cdots a_m$ be?
I am attempting to use a symmetry argument to show that $a_i=a_j \forall (i,j) \in {1,2,\cdots,m}$
I am trying to prove this condition by means of contradiction.
Suppose $\exists k,l$ s.t $a_k \not = a_l$ but the product is max/min. Then either $a_k > a_i$ or $a_k < a_i$. Consider the first case; since multiplication is commutative, hence we can swap $a_i$ and $a_k$ within the product. This would show that $a_k < a_i$. Hence, it contradicts our assumption. By similar reasoning, $a_k<a_l$ can also be shown to be false. Hence, $a_I=a_j \forall (i,j) \in {1,2,3, \cdots m}$
Is my reasoning correct ? If so, Is it a well known technique? I want to see further applications of this technique in problem solving.
If I have made a mistake, please highlight it.
Suppose $m=3$, $a_1 = n$, $a_2 = K$, $a_3 = -K$ with arbitrary $K$. Then the product is $-a_1 K^2$, which is not bounded. Hence at least the minimum or the maximum fails to exist.
Your proof has a problem: It assumes that solutions must be unique, or otherwise it does not use the fact that the solution is a maximum or a minimum at all.
With your technique, try starting from $3 = 1 \cdot 3$, then also $3 = 3 \cdot 1$, and reach a contradiction.
You can find local minimums or maximums for the function, and so necessary conditions for your problem, if they exist, by using analysis: optimize the value of the product and restrict the variables to the manifold defined by the sum condition.