Consider the analytic and bounded function $f:\mathbb{R}_{\leq x_0}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ with bounded first derivative such that $\alpha\in\mathbb{R}$ and \begin{equation} \alpha\varphi''(x_0)f(x_0)=\int_{-\infty}^{x_0}\varphi''(x)f(x)\mathop{\mathrm dx}, \end{equation} for every choice of sufficiently smooth function $\varphi:\mathbb{R}_{\leq x_0}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ where $\lim_{x\rightarrow -\infty}\varphi(x)=\varphi(x_0)=0$. It is known that $\varphi'(x_0)=\alpha\varphi''(x_0)$ and I have written the above condition in terms of $\varphi''(x_0)$ so that the statement applies $\forall\varphi$. If either $f(x_0)=0$ or $\lim_{x\rightarrow -\infty}f(x)=0$, then it is a direct consequence of the fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations that $f(x)=Ax+B$ for $A,B\in\mathbb{R}$ (the latter case requiring $\varphi$ to be continuously thrice-differentiable). If there were no such conditions on $f$, is a more general solution admissible for $f$?
2026-02-23 15:36:13.1771860973
Extending the fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations so that the integral is proportional to the endpoint of the integrand
64 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in CALCULUS-OF-VARIATIONS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Weak formulation of Robin boundary condition problem
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- Variational Formulation - inhomogeneous Neumann boundary
- Relationship between Training Neural Networks and Calculus of Variations
- How to prove a Minimal Surface minimizes Surface Tension
- Derive the Euler–Lagrange equation for a functional a single variable with higher derivatives.
- Does the covariant derivative commute with the variational derivative?
- Derivative of a functional w.r.t. a single point?
- calculus of variations with double integral textbook?
Related Questions in VARIATIONAL-ANALYSIS
- Calculus of Variation - Minimize a Functional
- Stationary Condition of Variational Iteration Method
- Existence and uniqueness of weak solutions to the homogeneous biharmonic equation.
- An example for a stable harmonic map which is not a local minimizer
- Similarity between the differential of functionals and functions
- Functional form of an Ordinary Differential Equation
- Beam equation is neccesary condition for minimum of specific functional.
- First variation of coordinate transformation
- Do there exist energy-minimizing immersions?
- Is there always a non-trivial homotopy class of maps which minimizes the Dirichlet energy?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations can still be applied as long as the equation is true for all smooth functions $\varphi$ that are compactly supported on $(-\infty,x_0)$. However, any compactly supported function would have all of its derivatives be $0$ outside its support, which means $\varphi''(x_0)=0$ and so : $$ \int_{-\infty}^{x_0} \varphi''(x)f(x)dx = 0, \ \ \ \forall \varphi \in \mathcal{C}_c((-\infty,x_0)), $$ and so we still have $f(x)=Ax+B$ according to the lemma. There's still hope that it might be slightly more general since we didn't assume that $f(x_0)=0$, but notice that, for any smooth $\varphi$ with compact support in $(-\infty,x_0]$ and with $\varphi(x_0)=0$ : $$ \int_{-\infty}^{x_0} f(x)\varphi''(x)dx = f\varphi'\vert_{-\infty}^{x_0} - \int_{-\infty}^{x_0}\underbrace{f'(x)}_{=A}\varphi'(x)dx = f(x_0)\varphi'(x_0) - A\underbrace{\varphi(x_0)}_{=0}, $$ and so the original equation becomes : $$ -\alpha\varphi''(x_0)f(x_0) = f(x_0)\varphi'(x_0), \ \ \ \forall \varphi \in \mathcal{C}_c((-\infty,x_0]) \text{ such that } \varphi(x_0)=0. $$ Taking any $\varphi$ that's equal to $(x-x_0)$ near $x_0$ yields $f(x_0)=0$, and so the solution is of the exact same form.