Is anyone aware of an extension of Pontryagin's principle where the cost (more precisely, the Langrangian) may depend on the derivative of the control? So, instead of $\int_{t_0}^{t_1} L(t,x,u) dt + K(x(t_1))$, the cost would be given by $\int_{t_0}^{t_1} L(t,x,u,u') dt + K(x(t_1))$, where $t \mapsto x(t)$ denotes the state variables induced by the control $t \mapsto u(t)$. (I know that in many situations the optimal control function will be not differentiable, but let us assume that we are in a situation where this holds true.)
2026-03-28 09:57:06.1774691826
Extension of Pontryagin's principle
89 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in OPTIMAL-CONTROL
- Do I really need quadratic programming to do a Model Predictive Controller?
- Transforming linear dynamical system to reduce magnitude of eigen values
- Hamiltonian minimization
- An approximate definition of optimal state trajectory of a discrete time system
- Reference request: Symmetric Groups and linear control systems
- Does the Pontryagrin maximum principle in sequential order result in same minimum?
- I can't get my Recursive Least Square algorithm work - What have I miss?
- Will LQR act like MPC in reality?
- Find which gain the process will be unstable?
- How do I find the maximum gain limit for a delayed system?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I have dealt with your same problem. Having a running cost term (the Lagrangian) that depends on the control is outside the statements of the Pontryagin Maximum Principle, Dynamic Programing and Krotov's extension principles. This is because choosing a control $u_i(t)$ means also choosing its derivative. Control (programs) are functions (of time), so each function comes with all its unique derivatives. At this point there is no difference between choosing $u_i$ to steer a system or choosing $\dot u_i$. It is absolutely valid to interpret $\dot u_i$ as a new control $v_i$ and $u_i$ as a new state variables $x_{n+1} = u_i$ s.t. $\dot x_{n+1} = v_i$. Here the general trick to solve your problem. Consider $$ I = F(T,x(T)) + \int_0^T L(t,x,u,\dot u)\ dt $$ subjec to $$ \dot x = f(t,x,u) $$ Now yow have to add a new set of variables $y$ and a new set of controls $v$ such that $$ \dot y = v $$ where $v$ coincides with the value of the derivatives of the controls $\dot u$. Now your problem will read $$ I = F(T,x(T)) + \int_0^T L(t,x,y,v) \ dr $$ subject to $$ \dot x = f(t,x,y) $$ and $$ \dot y = v $$
I found the same problem on the control of a wind turbine in order to maximize the energy subtracted from the wing current using the transmission ratio $\tau$ as a control variable . This can be done with actual technologies. In this case the equation of motions depends on the derivative of $\tau$. Could you tell me what systems are you dealing with?