Prove that if $(f_n)$ is a sequence of Borel measurable functions and if $f(x)=\lim_{n\to \infty}f_n(x)$ exists in $\mathbb{R}$, then $f$ is Borel measurable. In fact $f$ is Borel measurable even if we only have $f(x)=\lim_{n\to\infty}$ almost everywhere on $D$, some measurable domain.
Attempt/Thoughts:
Suppose $(f_n)$ is Borel measurable. That is, the preimage of $f_n$ for every interval of the form, (for $\alpha\in\overline{\mathbb{R}})$, $((\alpha,\infty])$ is a Borel set. We are given pointwise convergence, so by definition, $\forall\epsilon>0\exists N\in\mathbb{N}: \forall n\geq N: |f_n(x)-f(x)|<\epsilon$
I'm not sure how to proceed from here.
I'm not sure how to start the second part at all. I know that it means that $f$ is Borel measurable even if $f(x)=\lim_{n\to\infty}f_n(x)$ on $D\setminus E$, where $m(E)=0$.
Any suggestions would be welcome. Thanks.
I strongly suspect that the second part is not true. This because $(\mathbb R,\mathcal B,\lambda)$ where $\mathcal B$ denotes the Borel sigma algebra and $\lambda$ the Lebesgue measure, is not a complete measure space.
That makes it possible to find sets $D\subset E\subset\mathbb{R}$ such that $D$ is a Borel set, $E$ is not a Borel set and $\lambda\left(\mathbb{R}-D\right)=0$.
Define $f=1_{E}$ and for $n=1,2,\dots$ define $f_{n}=1_{D}$.
Then $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}f_{n}\left(x\right)=f\left(x\right)$ on $D$, hence almost everywhere. However $f$ is not Borel-measurable.