I want to show that if $\mu$ and $\nu$ are probability measures on $\mathbb{R}^d$ that are invariant under rotations and $f(x)=\|x\|_2=\left(\sum\limits_{i=1}^d x_i^2\right)$ sucht that the pushforwards are the same,i.e. $f_{\#}\mu=f_{\#}\nu$ then $\mu=\nu$. I understand that if the pushforwards are the same than the measure on the "annuli" of $\mathbb{R}^d$ will be the same. Also I understand that since the measures are invariant under rotations that if we cut the annulus (A) into $n$ small pieces (with one of these pieces called $P$) then $n\cdot\nu(P)=\nu(A)=\mu(A)=n\cdot\mu(P)$ so we get that $\mu(P)=\nu(P)$. So intuitively I can imagine that $\mu$ and $\nu$ will be the same. But I don't see how to make a rigorous argument.
2026-03-26 01:14:31.1774487671
$f(x)=\|x\|_2$, $f_{\#}\mu=f_{\#}\nu\implies\mu=\nu$
67 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in PUSHFORWARD
- Equality Proof of Pushforward and Pullback
- Basic question about related vector fields and pushforwards
- Finding the components of a pushforward vector in local coordinates
- Calculating push forwards of a vector field
- Push-forward and Category theory
- Blow up of $\mathbb{P}^2$ in a point and direct image sheaves
- On the $\pi$-induced pushforward of a tensor field on $TM$
- partial derivatives and chain rule of functions defined on manifold
- Push-forward of a measure from $\mathbb{R}^d$ to $\mathbb{R}^d\times\mathbb{R}^d$
- Pushforward formula for Lebesgue Stieltjes Measure
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If you are familiar with Lebesgue differentiation theorem for finite Borel measures on $\mathbb{R}^n$, the claim is a quick corollary of this result.
If you are not, one way to prove the claim is as follows: let $\mathcal{A}$ be the family of Borel sets such that $\mu(A)=\nu(A)$. You proved that this holds for annuli and "slices" of annuli. It's easy to prove that $\mathcal{A}$ is a Dynkin system. Thus, from Dynkin's theorem it follows that the $\sigma-$algebra generated by slices of annuli (let's call it $\mathcal{B}$) is contained in $\mathcal{A}$. It's not hard to see that $\mathcal{B}$ contains the open balls, and thus it's the Borel $\sigma-$algebra, and so the two measures are equal.
Edit:
To see why $\mathcal{B}$ contains the open balls, one can use the following: let $B$ be a open ball. First, suppose that $0\not\in\overline{B}$. Now, let $P:\Omega\to [0,2\pi)\times[0,\pi]^{n-1}\times \mathbb{R}$ be the polar coordinates map (where $\Omega$ is a suitable region containing $B$ such that $P_{|\Omega}$ is a diffeomorphism). Its easy to see that the slices of annuli get mapped to open $n-$cells and viceversa, while $B$ gets mapped to an open set $P(B)$. Since open $n-$cells generate the topology, we can write $P(B)=\cup_\mathbb N C_i$ (with $C_i$ the cells). Taking the inverse (which is well defined because $P$ is a diffeomorphism) we get that $B=\cup_\mathbb{N} P^{-1}(C_i)$ and since $P^{-1}(C_i)$ are slices of annuli, we are done.
Now, let $B$ be general. If it contains $0$, we can cover a neighbourhood of it by a small ball centered in $0$ (which is in $\mathcal{B}$ as we now from the start), let us call it $B(0)$. For every $x\in \mathbb{Q}^n-\{0\}:x\in B$, let $r>0$ be such that $B_{r/2}(x)\subset B_r(x)\subseteq B$. It is easy to see that if $0\not \in B=\cup_\mathbb N B(r_i/2,x_i)$, otherwise $B=B(0)\cup_\mathbb N B(r_i/2,x_i)$ and we are done