A numerical evidence given by WA strongly suggests that, when $p$ is an odd prime, the Fibonacci polynomial $F_{p}(x)$ factors mod $p$ explicitly as follows: $$ F_{p}(x) = (x^2+4)^{\frac{p-1}{2}} $$
I've love to see a proof. You may want to start here.
The factorization above can be refined as follows:
If $p \equiv 1 \bmod 4$, then $x^2+4=(x-a)(x+a)$, where $a^2 \equiv -4 \bmod p$.
If $p \equiv 3 \bmod 4$, then $x^2+4$ is irreducible mod $p$.
but this is well known.
As mentioned in the "Identities" section of the Wikipedia article you linked to, one has for all $n$ $$ \sqrt{x^2 + 4}F_n(x) = (\alpha(x) - \beta(x))F_n(x) = \alpha(x)^n - \beta(x)^n $$ where $$ \alpha(x) = \frac{x + \sqrt{x^2 + 4}}{2} \quad \text{and} \quad \beta(x) = \frac{x - \sqrt{x^2 + 4}}{2}. $$ Thus when $p$ is an odd prime number we have in $\mathbb{Z}_p(x)[\sqrt{x^2 + 4}]$ $$ \sqrt{x^2 + 4}F_p(x) = \alpha(x)^p - \beta(x)^p = (\alpha(x) - \beta(x))^p = \sqrt{x^2 + 4}^p. $$
The used explicit formula for $F_n(x)$ can be derived by diagonalizing the matrix of the recurrence relation as N. S. did. Alternatively, it can be proved by induction. A proof by induction is shorter, but does not provide the insight that the matrix approach does (i.e. it does not show how one would every come up with such a formula).