Fermats Little Theorem Proof

352 Views Asked by At

So I have to prove Fermats Little Theorem which states that if p is a prime and a is a integer that cannot be divided by $p$, then

$a^{p-1}\equiv 1\pmod{p}$.

So my proof is:

Let $p$ be a prime and a be a integer that cannot be divided by $p$. Consider the two sequences of numbers where we represent the residual classes with the numbers $1,2,...,p-1$:

$x: 1, 2, 3, \ldots, (p-1)$, which are the residual classes,

$a\cdot x: a\cdot 1, a\cdot 2, ..., a\cdot (p-1)$.

Since $\gcd(a,p)=1$, two different numbers in the second row cannot be congruent modulo $p$. If they were we would have that $c\cdot a≡b\cdot a\pmod{p}, 1\le c<b \le p-1$ and since $\gcd(a,p)=1$ we can cancel out $a$ so $c\equiv b\pmod{p}$ which means that $c=b$. This means that we have the same remainders mod $p$ in both rows (maybe in a different order).

We therefore have that $(a\cdot 1)\cdot (a\cdot 2) \cdot \cdots \cdot (a\cdot (p-1))\equiv 1\cdot 2\cdot 3\cdot \cdots \cdot (p-1)\pmod{p}$. This means that $a^{p-1}\cdot 1\cdot 2\cdot \cdots \cdot (p-1)≡1\cdot 2\cdot \cdots \cdot (p-1)\pmod{p}$.

Since $2,3,...,(p-1)$ are relatively prime with $p$ we can cancel them out so we get that

$a^{p-1}\equiv 1\pmod{p}$.

Are there any errors or places which needs better/more explanation? Thank you for your time!

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On

Your proof is correct. I’d try to be a little more technical and state that $\phi: x \mapsto ax$ is a permutation over the residues (you prove this the way you already did) and use modular inverses instead of “cancel out”, but everything is correct.