Before this problem, I had to show that $65$ could be written as a sum of two squares. After this, I used ProofWiki to find solutions of the problem, which I got, for example, $65^2=(1+8^2)(4^2+7^2)=60^2+(-25)^2$. But $(60^2,25^2)\neq 1$. I used Bezout's identity, and can't find any connections to Euclidean Division.
Find a solution to $x^2+y^2=65^2$ with $(x,y)=1$
321 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail AtThere are 4 best solutions below
On
$$x^2+y^2=65^2 \implies x \le 65$$
so you can put $x=1,2,3...64$ and try to find $y $ for each $x $.
a kind of disjunction of cases.
On
If you want, you could find all solutions then filter for the ones where $x$ and $y$ are relatively prime.
To do this, note that $x^2 + y^2 = 65^2$ is equivalent to: $$(x+iy) (x-iy) = 65^2 = 5^2 \cdot 13^2 = (2+i)^2 (2-i)^2 (3+2i)^2 (3-2i)^2.$$ Therefore, by unique factorization in the Gaussian integers $\mathbb{Z}[i]$, we can conclude $$x+iy = u (2+i)^a (2-i)^b (3+2i)^c (3-2i)^d,$$ where $u \in \{ \pm 1, \pm i \}$ is a unit, and $0 \le a, b, c, d \le 2$. Now, the equation for $(x+iy) (x-iy)$ also implies that $a + b = 2$ and $c + d = 2$. Therefore, there are 36 solutions $(x, y) \in \mathbb{Z}^2$ in all.
Also, note that for example if $a = b = 1$, then $5 \mid x + iy$ so $5 \mid x$ and $5 \mid y$, so these solutions can be excluded. Similarly, solutions with $c = d = 1$ can be excluded. This leaves just 16 possibilities to check (and many of them are related to each other by natural symmetries).
On
Let us solve the problem with the computer.
First of all the sage code, to have a clear image:
sage: K.<j> = QuadraticField(-1)
sage: N = 65^2
sage: K(N).factor()
(-3*j - 2)^2 * (-j - 2)^2 * (2*j + 1)^2 * (2*j + 3)^2
sage: AllSolutions = [ (x,y) for x in [1..N] for y in [1..N] if x^2+y^2 == N ]
sage: RelativelyPrimeSolutions = [ (x,y) for (x,y) in AllSolutions if gcd(x,y)==1 ]
sage: AllSolutions
[(16, 63),
(25, 60),
(33, 56),
(39, 52),
(52, 39),
(56, 33),
(60, 25),
(63, 16)]
sage: RelativelyPrimeSolutions
[(16, 63), (33, 56), (56, 33), (63, 16)]
Now in words. Every decomposition of $N=65^2$ in the form $N=x^2+y^2$ is equivalent to one decomposition $$ N =(x+iy)(x-y) $$ in the ring of gaussian integers $$ R = \Bbb Z[i] $$ which is the integers ring of the field $\Bbb Q(i)$. The arithmetic ring $R$ is a unique factorization domain, and the decomposition of $N$ is unique in this ring, explicitly it is: $$ 65^2 = N = (2+i)^2(2-i)^2\, (3+2i)^2(3-2i)^2\ . $$ Now we "combine factors", taking some factors for $(x+iy)$, such that the same amount of conjugated factors remain for $(x-iy)$. We have many chances to do this. From the part with four prime factors $(2+i)^2(2-i)^2$ we may extact one of the following multiplicative pieces, always two "pieces" (i.e. prime factors):
- $s+it=(2+i)^2$, or
- $s+it=(2+i)(2-i)=5$, or
- $s+it=(2-i)^2$.
The same happens with the other factors, we can only combine:
- $u+iv=(3+2i)^2$, or
- $u+iv=(3+2i)(3-2i)=13$, or
- $u+iv=(3-2i)^2$.
Now we combine the chances, getting solutions $$x+iy = \text{unit}\cdot(s+it)(u+iv)$$ for the combined choices of the factors of $5^2$ and $13^2$. The units are $1,i,-1,-i$. Multiplying with a unit means either changing "some" signs, or exchanging $x,y$ and changing "some" signs. We will search for solutions up to these simple operations.
Note that in case we already have $s+it=5\in \Bbb Z$ or $u+iv=13\in \Bbb Z$, the obtained solution is not relatively prime in $\Bbb Z$.
The remained four cases lead to the four solutions $\pm x\pm iy$, by isolating the real, respectively imaginary part in $R=\Bbb Z[i]$ from $$ (2\pm i)^2(3\pm2i)^2\ .$$ Then we pass from $\pm x$ to $|\pm x|$, if needed, same for the $y$ component. Here we have:
sage: for a in [ 2+j, 2-j ]:
....: for b in [ 3+2*j, 3-2*j ]:
....: print "(%s)^2(%s)^2 = %s" % ( a, b, a^2*b^2 )
....:
(j + 2)^2(2*j + 3)^2 = 56*j - 33
(j + 2)^2(-2*j + 3)^2 = -16*j + 63
(-j + 2)^2(2*j + 3)^2 = 16*j + 63
(-j + 2)^2(-2*j + 3)^2 = -56*j - 33
Above we get only two "true solutions", $(56,33)$, and $(16,63)$ in natural numbers, after changing signs.
The other two solutions are obtained by exchanging the components. (Use the unit $i$... This and the $\pm$ adjustment comes from the existence of the units $\pm1, \pm i$ in the gaussian ring of integers $R=\Bbb Z[i]$.)
The solution was displayed, so that the structure is transparent, and the pattern is clear for the next time, when we have for instance $N=8125$...
All Primitive Pythagorean Triples have the property that they can be written as
$$(m^2-n^2,2mn,m^2+n^2)$$
If you let $m=7,n=4$ you will get the triple $$33^2+56^2=65^2$$ and they're coprime.
You could also let $m=8,n=1$ and you get the triple $$16^2+63^2=65^2$$
also coprime. These are the only solutions, as there is no other way to write $65$ as $m^2+n^2.$