(HMMT 2000 Guts round #45). Find all integers $x$ so that there is an integer y so that ${x\choose y} = 1999000$.
The point of this question is to better understand a post on AoPs. I'm not even sure if the post is entirely correct. I'd say the main point I don't get is why we can't have $y> 1999$. I don't quite understand why their use of Bertrand's postulate works, since it might not ensure there is a prime exceeding y between $x-y+1$ and $x$. The Sylvester-Schur theorem mentioned below can be used to ensure this, but I don't think it is necessary.
I checked out the solution here at AOPS.
Is there a way to shorten the solution on AoPs that avoids using Bertrand's postulate?
To shorten the AOPS answer:
Claim: $x = 1999000, x=2000$ are the only solutions.
Set $N = 1999000$ for simplicity. $\binom{N}{1} = N$ and $\binom{2000}{2} = N$ are nearly trivial. Now we show there are no other solutions. We consider three cases:
For the first case, note that $1999$ is prime. Since $N$ has a factor of $1999$, no binomial coefficient with $x < 1999$ can be equal to $N$, so there are no solutions to the first case.
It's easy to show that $\binom{1999}{3} > N > \binom{1999}{2}$, and thus there are no solutions to the second case.
For the third case: we know the binomial formula. Let's consider what happens if we increase $y$ by $1$ while keeping $N$ constant, and we assume our new $x$ will be $x+n$, and for the moment that $n$ is positive:
$$ \begin{gather} N = \frac{x!}{y! \cdot (x-y)!} = \frac{(x+n)!}{(y+1)! \cdot (x+n-y-1)!} \\[1ex] (x+n)! \cdot (x-y)! \cdot y! = x! \cdot (y+1)! \cdot (x+n-y-1)! \\[1ex] (x+n)(x+n-1)\cdots (x+1) = (y+1) \cdot [(x-y+n-1)(x-y+n-2) \cdots (x-y+1)] \\[1ex] y+1 = \frac{(x+n)(x+n-1)\cdots(x+1) \color{red}{ \ [n \text{ terms}}]} {(x-y+n-1)(x-y+n-2) \cdots (x-y+1) \color{blue}{ \ [\mathbf{n-1} \text{ terms}}]} \\[1ex] y+1 = (x+1) \prod_{k=1}^n \frac{x+k}{x+k-y-1} \end{gather}$$
We know $x > y$ here, meaning that every term in the product is
positivegreater than zero, and the product ispositivegreater than zero (Man, where was my brain when I wrote this?). But this is a contradiction: the equality can't hold if $x>y$. Hence, $n$ must be negative if we increase $y$ by 1. (Perform the same manipulations with $x-n$ and you get equations that could hold.) Because of the symmetry of the binomials, this will be true until $y=x/2$, at which point it $x$ will reach a minimum.Hence there are no solutions with $x>1999$, and we are done.