$$x \equiv \ 1 \pmod3$$ $$x \equiv \ 2 \pmod5$$ $$x \equiv \ 8 \pmod{11}$$
From the first, I have $x=3k+1$, $x=5j+2$ from the second and $x=11l+8$ from the third. Subbing the third into the second I get
$11l+8 \equiv 2 \pmod5$
$l \equiv -6\pmod5$
$l \equiv -1\pmod5$
So $l=5m-1$
Subbing back into the third equation I had, I get
$x=11(5m-1)+8=55m-3$
Thus $x \equiv -3\pmod{55}$.
I was only asked to find any integer x which satisfies the system of congruences, so any of x of that form should work; i.e. $x=52$.
I want to know if this is the smallest such $x$ which would work, or could I have approached the question in a different way and arrived at another answer?
If I'd been asked to find the smallest $x$, or all $x$, I'm not sure if this approach would have worked. Is there a way to confirm that this is the smallest such $x$, or that all $x$ of the form $x \equiv -3\pmod{55}$ are the only $x$ which satisfy the system?
The smallest answer is 52
Java program for proving this