Find general solution of Differential equation if you know three solutions. I tried to solve this problem, however I have a question about the Wronskian. Three particular solutions are 1, $x$, ${x^2}$. I know, that general solution can be written as $C_1{(x^2-1)} +C_2{(x-1) + 1}$, because difference of two particular is general. However, there is a theorem that says if Wronskian equals zero in one point, then the functions are linearly dependent. Proof that ODE solutions with Wronskian identically zero are linearly dependent. And I'm stuck here, ${W[x^2-1,x-1]}$ is zero when ${x=1}$, so this functions can't form a general solution, as they linearly dependent. But in the textbook $C_1{(x^2-1)} +C_2{(x-1) + 1}$ is a solution, where is a mistake in my reasoning? I totally understand that ${1,x,x^2}$ are linearly independent, I just want to understand, why this theorem doesn't work and where is my mistake. I can also give a proof of the theorem, as short, as I can: let's consider ${y(x)}$ is a solution to a differential equation with general solution $C_1{(x^2-1)} +C_2{(x-1)}$, then ${y(x) = C_1{(x^2-1)} +C_2{(x-1)}.}$ Let ${C_1 = 1, C_2=-2}$. ${y(1) =0}$ and ${y'(1)=0}$ and there exists only one solution by existence and uniqueness theorem. Therefore ${y(x)=0}$ and $C_1{(x^2-1)} +C_2{(x-1)}$ linearly dependent.
2026-02-23 10:20:10.1771842010
Find general solution of Differential equation if you know three solutions. Is there exist general solution if Wronskian is zero?
89 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ORDINARY-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- The Runge-Kutta method for a system of equations
- Analytical solution of a nonlinear ordinary differential equation
- Stability of system of ordinary nonlinear differential equations
- Maximal interval of existence of the IVP
- Power series solution of $y''+e^xy' - y=0$
- Change of variables in a differential equation
- Dimension of solution space of homogeneous differential equation, proof
- Solve the initial value problem $x^2y'+y(x-y)=0$
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Derive an equation with Faraday's law
Related Questions in WRONSKIAN
- Wronskian Problem
- Wronskian of Airy functions.
- Does vanishing of wronskian of solutions at point $\implies$ solutions are linearly dependent?
- Wronskian is infinite
- Linear dependence and linear independence of functions in linear algebra
- Wronskian of set of solutions to $2$nd order ODE vs systems of two $1$st order ODEs
- Wronskian is not defined
- Principle of Superposition and Wronskian
- Clarification of Wronskian
- When using the Frobenius method, and r1-r2 is neither zero nor a positive integer, can you use the Wronskian to find the second solution?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You can verify that $y(x)=C_1(x^2-1)+C_2(x-1)$ is the general solution to the second order linear ODE $$ y''-\frac{2}{x-1}y'+\frac{2}{(x-1)^2}y=0. \tag{1} $$ The proof of the theorem you mention assumes that the coefficients $p_0(x), p_1(x),\ldots,p_{n-1}(x)$ of the linear differential equation $$ y^{(n)}+p_{n-1}(x)y^{(n-1)}+\ldots+p_1(x)y'+p_0(x)y=0 \tag{2} $$ are continuous. In Eq. $(1)$, however, $p_0(x)=\frac{2}{(x-1)^2}$ and $p_1(x)=-\frac{2}{x-1}$ are not continuous at $x=1$, so the vanishing of the Wronskian $W[x^2-1,x-1]$ at $x=1$ does not imply that $x^2-1$ and $x-1$ are linear dependent functions.