I'm finding it really hard to find the logical errors in this proof. I'm still new at this and trying to learn it.
Claim: for all $n$ is in set $\mathbb{N}$(Natural numbers), if $2n+1$ is a multiple of $3$ then, $n^2+1$ is a multiple of $3$.
Proof: by contrapositive. Assume that $2n+1$ is not a multiple of $3$.
It follows that
- If $n = 3k+1$ for $k \in \mathbb{N}$ then $n^2+1 = 9k^2+6k+2$ is not a multiple of $3$.
- If $n = 3k+2$ for $k \in \mathbb{N}$ then $n^2+1 = 9k^2+12k+5$ is not a multiple of $3$.
- If $n = 3k+3$ for $k \in \mathbb{N}$ then $n^2+1 = 9k^2+18k+10$ is not a multiple of $3$.
Where are the logical errors in the proof? I don't understand.
Any help would be appreciated, thank you!
The contrapositive of the statement "If $A$, then $B$" is the statement "If not $B$, then not $A$".
For the statement
the contrapositive is
However, the proof assumed that $2n+1$ is not a multiple of $3$ and then proved that $n^2+1$ is not a multiple of $3$, i.e. the proof proved the statement
This is the inverse, not the contrapositive of the original statement. Proving the inverse of a statement is not equivalent to proving the original statement. Hence, that proof doesn't prove what it is supposed to prove.