Given $C[0,2]$ with the the max-norm. Let $X= \{x\in C ([0,2]): x (1) =0\}$. We define $S:X\to\mathbb{R}$ as $S(x)=\int_{0}^{2}x(t)dt$ . Compute $||S||$. I have already found that $||S||\leq2$, but I haven't come up with the way to prove $||S||\geq 2$. Are there any hints?. Thanks in advance.
2026-02-23 19:20:12.1771874412
Find the norm of S
98 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in NORMED-SPACES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Closure and Subsets of Normed Vector Spaces
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- derive the expectation of exponential function $e^{-\left\Vert \mathbf{x} - V\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{a}\right\Vert^2}$ or its upper bound
- Minimum of the 2-norm
- Show that $\Phi$ is a contraction with a maximum norm.
- Understanding the essential range
- Mean value theorem for functions from $\mathbb R^n \to \mathbb R^n$
- Metric on a linear space is induced by norm if and only if the metric is homogeneous and translation invariant
- Gradient of integral of vector norm
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-CALCULUS
- About vectors that have bounded support representation on the spectrum of a self-adjoint operator
- proving existence of a particular linear operator on the space of bounded functions
- How do I prove that the following function is increasing in $t\geq 1$ for any $1\leq y \leq t$?
- Proving that a family of exponential operators has a uniform bound, without semigroup theory.
- Consider the operator $T:L^2(0,1)\rightarrow L^2(0,1)$. Is it well defined, linear, bounded, compact?
- Is this a Functional Differential Equation? How to solve it?
- Holomorphic functional calculus proving a property of fractional powers
- Showing that the Holomorphic Functional Calculus preserves adjoints.
- Compute $\frac{d}{dx(t)}\int_0^Tx(\tau)^TAx(\tau)d\tau$
- If $f \in C(\sigma(a))$ and $g \in C(\sigma(f(a)))$, proof that $(g \circ f)(a) = g(f(a))$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I thought I would spell out in some more detail the point discussed in the comments by me and other contributors. We all more or less suggest the same thing.
The point is that you can't just choose $x(t) = 1$ for every $t$ since you have the additional constraint that $x(1)=0$. But you can see by sketching graphs that you could almost have a function which is $1$ everywhere, except for some small interval around $t=1$.
Remember that $$\|S\|_* = \sup_{\max x(t) =1}|Sx|.$$ You know that $$\|S\|_*\leq 2,$$ and it seems plausible that we actually have equality. Suppose for a contradiction that we did not have equality. Then there exists $\alpha<2$ such that $\alpha$ is an upper bound for the set $\{|Sx| : \max x(t) =1\}.$ If we call $\alpha = 2-\epsilon$ for some $\epsilon>0$, it suffices to show that there exists $\tilde x\in X$ such that $$|S\tilde x|\geq 2-\epsilon.$$
For this, I suggested choosing the function $$\tilde x(t) = \begin{cases}-\frac{2}{\epsilon} t+\frac{2}{\epsilon} & \text{ if } 1-\frac\epsilon 2<t\leq 1\\ \frac 2\epsilon t-\frac 2\epsilon &\text{ if }1<t\leq 1+\frac\epsilon 2\\ 1&\text{ otherwise.}\end{cases}$$
See pictured with $\epsilon = 0.3$. Then the integral is $\int_0^2 \tilde x\, dt = 2- \frac 12 \epsilon >2-\epsilon.$ This leads us to a contradiction. Alternatively you could have chosen $\tilde x$ as Ryszard Szwarc suggested, as some function $\tilde x(t) = |t-1|^{1/n}$ where you would need to find some $n$ sufficiently large so that a similar estimate for the integral holds.