Let $n$ be the number of distinct complex values which the polynomial function $P(x) =x^6+2x^5+5x^4+4x^3+6x^2+5x+7$ takes, if $x$ is a solution of $x^3+x+1=0$. Find $n$.
I am a bit confused by this problem because what value I get for $n$ is different than what the workbook offers as a result.
If $x$ is a solution of $x^3+x+1=0$, then there is one real solution $x_1$ and two complex, conjugate solution $x_2$, $x_3$ (this can be proven by differentiating $f(x)=x^3+x+1$ once and proving $f$ crosses $OX$ once). Following this line of thought, there must be at least two complex values that $P(x)$ takes, as for $x_1$ it will be a real number and for $x_2$ or $x_3$ the value should be strictly complex (that is, with a term that contains $i$), both "outputs" being complex values (although one is real, because $\mathbb{R}\subset\mathbb{C}$), thus $n\geq 2$. Going further isn't necessary because the book says $n=1$, so there's only one complex value $P(x)$ takes using the solutions of $x^3+x+1=0$. How is that possible? Do you think by "distinct complex values" they mean purely complex numbers and not real ones? Or is perhaps my logic faulty?
Also, tangentially related, if a polynomial has real coefficients, do complex, conjugated numbers return the same value? Or can $z$ and $\bar z$ return different values?
You're going a bit overkill. I agree that $x^3+x+1 = 0$ has $1$ real and two complex solutions. But, they're not easy to find (you'll need the Cubic Formula). Unless you're doing a course that involves this formula (or preparing for a contest that requires it), you're not supposed to use it.
As a general method, when you know the value of a lower-degree polynomial $q(x)$ for some specific $x$, (usually $q(x)$ for these $x$s is zero, like here) and you want to find a higher degree polynomial $p(x)$, your aim should be to form an equation something like this:
$$p(x) = q(x)s(x) + r(x)$$where $r(x)$ is of the minimum possible degree (in other words, just divide $p(x)$ by $q(x)$, $s(x)$ is quotient and $r(x)$ is remainder).
Turns out, here $r(x)$ has a very less degree...