This question was asked before, but I was wondering if there's a different approach for this problem.
Find two pairs of relatively prime positive integers $(a,c)$ so that $a^2+5929=c^2$. Can you find additional pairs with $gcd(a,c)>1$?
So, if I was given c instead, and tried to find a and b, then that would be easy. We can write 2c as a sum of squares provided that c is a product of primes congruent to 1 mod 4, then we can find s,t by using the identity and be able to get a and b. I'm trying to use the same approach here but with no luck.
$b = (s^2 - t^2)/2$ 5929 = 77^2
Not sure if it would have helped in finding a and c, but 77 = 7*11, which is not congruent to 1 mod 4, so I cannot write this as a sum of two squares and I cannot apply the identity here.
I'm not really sure how to apply the same techniques here. Any help would be appreciated.
Pythagorean primitive triplet constructions are always very useful. It says that if $a^2+b^2=c^2$, then if $(a,c)$ are relatively prime, $a=2uv$, $b=u^2-v^2$ and $c=u^2+v^2$ for some $u,v$. Hence it is required to write $b$ as a difference of squares. What better than $39^2-38^2=77$? (this is a standard trick, namely that $(n+1)^2-n^2=(2n+1)$, with $n=38$). Now, $2uv=2964$ and $u^2+v^2=2965$, and we have that $2964^2+77^2=2965^2$, where of course $2964$ and $2965$ are co-prime.
To give another answer, we have that $(c-a)(c+a)=7^2 \cdot 11^2$. So find a pair of numbers summing to $121$ and whose difference is $49$. These will turn out to be $85$ and $36$, and their difference is $5929$ as well. These numbers are co-prime too.
If you are looking for non co-prime pairs, nobody stops you from scaling! For example, take any triplet containing $7$, say $7^2+24^2=25^2$. Multiply both sides by $11^2$ to get $77^2 + 264^2=275^2$. Then $264$ and $275$ are not coprime, they are both multiples of $11$.
To give just one more example, $11^2 + 60^2=61^2$, and multiplying by $7^2$, we have that $77^2+420^2=427^2$, and $420$ and $427$ are not co prime because both are multiples of $7$.