Suppose we are given a separable Hilbert space $H$ with countable orthonormal basis $\{e_n\}$. Suppose we are given an orthonormal set $\{f_n\}$ such that $\sum\|e_n-f_n\| < 1$. How do we prove that $\{f_n\}$ is in fact an orthonormal basis?
2026-03-26 12:41:15.1774528875
Finding an orthonormal basis from an existing one in a Hilbert space
325 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in HILBERT-SPACES
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- hyponormal operators
- a positive matrix of operators
- If $S=(S_1,S_2)$ hyponormal, why $S_1$ and $S_2$ are hyponormal?
- Is the cartesian product of two Hilbert spaces a Hilbert space?
- Show that $ Tf $ is continuous and measurable on a Hilbert space $H=L_2((0,\infty))$
- Kernel functions for vectors in discrete spaces
- The space $D(A^\infty)$
- Show that $Tf$ is well-defined and is continious
- construction of a sequence in a complex Hilbert space which fulfills some specific properties
Related Questions in ORTHONORMAL
- Orthonormal basis for $L^2(\mathbb{R}^n,\mathbb{F})$
- What is $\| f \|$ where $f(x)=\sum\limits_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{3^n} \langle x,e_n\rangle$
- Forming an orthonormal basis with these independent vectors
- Orthogonal Function Dirac Delta Series
- Sum of two rank $1$ matrices with some property gives rank $2$ matrix
- Zero element in an Hilbert space is orthogonal?
- Prove that $\lVert X\rVert^2 =\sum_{i,j=1}^\infty\lvert\langle u_i,Xu_j\rangle\rvert^2$.
- Is there any connection between the fact that a set of vectors are mutually orthogonal and the same set of vectors are linearly independent
- Compute the norm of a linear operator using a normal basis in an infinite Hilbert space
- If $M$ is the span of a finite orthonormal set in a Hilbert space then $M$ is closed
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Recall that an orthonormal sequence in a Hilbert space is an orthonormal basis if and only if it is complete, that is $x\perp f_n$ for all $n$ if and only if $x=0$.
So, suppose that $x\perp f_n$ for all $n$ but $x\neq 0$. Then,
$$ \vert \langle x,e_n\rangle\vert = \vert \langle x,e_n-f_n+f_n\rangle\vert \leq \vert \langle x,e_n-f_n\rangle\vert+\vert \langle x,f_n\rangle\vert=\vert\langle x,e_n-f_n\rangle\vert $$ where the last equality follows since $\langle x,f_n\rangle = 0$ for all $n$ by assumption. Squaring both sides and using CSB inequality, we obtain
$$ \vert \langle x,e_n\rangle\vert^2\leq \vert\langle x,e_n-f_n\rangle\vert^2\leq \|x\|^2\|e_n-f_n\|^2 $$ Summing both sides, we obtain
$$ \sum_{n=1}^\infty\vert \langle x,e_n\rangle\vert^2\leq \|x\|^2\sum_{n=1}^\infty\|e_n-f_n\|^2 $$ Now, your assumption that $\sum\|e_n-f_n\|<1$ implies that the sum of the squares is also strictly less than one. Thus if $x\perp f_n$ for all $n$, we have shown that
$$ \sum_{n=1}^\infty\vert\langle x,e_n\rangle\vert^2 < \|x\|^2, $$which is a contradiction of the Pythagorean theorem/Parseval's identity. Thus $x=0$, and $\{f_n\}$ is complete.