if $ G = <a,b| a^9 = b^3 = 1, bab^{-1} = a^4> $ of order 27
then know the following, that any element can be written as $b^ka^n$ with n $\in [0,8], k\in[0,2]$ and that the 11 conjugacy classes are as follows:
$\{1\}\{a^3\}\{a^6\}\{a,a^4,a^7\}\{a^2,a^5,a^8\}\{b,ba^3,ba^6\}\{ba,ba^7,ba^4\}\{ba^2,ba^5,ba^8\}\{b^2,b^2a^3,b^2a^6\}\{b^2a,b^2a^4,b^2a^7\}\{b^2a^2,b^2a^5,b^2a^8\}$
Then if H is a normal subgroup generated by $a$ with linear character $\rho$ such that $\rho(a) = e^{2\pi i/9}$, how would i compute the induced character $\rho^G$ as well as the character table
I know there will be 11 irreducible characters of G but am unsure as to how to start with filling in the entries of the table. As this is a past exam question with no solution i have no source of hints to point me in the right direction for the answer
any help would be greatly appreciated
I think my answer will be quite similar to Mark's, but I find it slightly more elementary.
As Mark said, the Abelianisation of $G$ is the Abelian group generated by two commuting order-3 elements $A$ and $B$ (and, obviously, the Abelianisation map sends $a$ to $A$ and $b$ to $B$). This gives you a complete list of $1$-dimensional irreducible representations: there are nine of them, and you will see in your character table the character table of $C_3\times C_3$.
By the way, your list of conjugacy classes is now easy to understand. Conjugate elements are mapped to the same element in the Abelianised group. Since the Abelianisation map is 3-to-1 and the number of elements in a conjugacy class must divide the order of the group, the conjugacy classes have 1 or 3 elements.
An element $g$ is alone in its conjugacy class iff it is in the center of $G$ : there is only three such elements (you can check it by hand or you can use small group theory exercises: the center of $G$ has to be nontrivial because $G$ is a $3$-group, and it cannot have more than $3$ elements because, else, $G/ZG$ would be cyclic, which forces $G$ to be Abelian). So the center of $G$ has three elements: $\mathrm{id}$, $a^3$ and $a^6$, and the other conjugacy classes are the 3-element sets which are sent to the same (nontrivial) element in the Abelianisation: $c_{i,j} = \{a^i b^j, a^{i+3} b^j, a^{i+6} b^j\}$. We then have three one-element classes and eight three-element ones.
Then, you can use the $\sum_\chi (\dim \chi)^2 = |G|$ formula to obtain that the $11 - 9 = 2$ remaining representations have dimensions $n_1, n_2 > 1$ such that $n_1^2 + n_2^2 = 27 - 9 = 18$. The only solution is $n_1 = n_2 = 3$.
Now, I will prove that the characters corresponding to these $3$-dimensional representations vanish on the $3$-element conjugacy classes. Indeed, suppose that for one of these classes, $\chi_\rho(c) = z \neq 0$. Then I can use a one-dimensional representation $\lambda$ to twist $\rho$: I get an irreducible representation $\rho \otimes \lambda$ such that $$\chi_{\rho \otimes \lambda}(c) = \lambda(c) \chi_{\rho}(c).$$ Because these three-element conjugacy classes are sent to a nontrivial element in the Abelianised group, I can find two one-dimensional representations such that $\lambda_1(c) = j$ and $\lambda_2(c) = j^2$. The three $3$-dimensional irreducibles representations $\rho$, $\rho \otimes \lambda_1$ and $\rho \otimes \lambda_2$ then have to be different (their characters take different values on the conjugacy class $c$), but that's absurd, because there are only two $3$-dimensional irreducible representations. (You can also prove this result using the orthogonality conditions).
We still have four undetermined entries (the values of the two 3-dimensional characters on the two nontrivial central conjugacy classes), but the orthonormality conditions are now enough to determine them.
If $\alpha = 3 e^{\frac{2 \pi i}3}$ and $\alpha' = \overline{\alpha}$, we then get the full character table (where $\mathrm{III}_k$ are the eight 3-element conjugacy classes).
$$\begin{array}{c||ccc|ccc|ccc|cc} &\{\mathrm{id}\} & \mathrm{III}_1 & \mathrm{III}_2 & \mathrm{III}_3 & \mathrm{III}_4 & \mathrm{III}_5 & \mathrm{III}_6 & \mathrm{III}_7 & \mathrm{III}_8 & \{a^3\} & \{a^6\}\\ \hline \hline 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ \lambda_1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & j & j & j & j^2 & j^2 & j^2 & 1 & 1 \\ \lambda_2 & 1 & 1 & 1 & j^2 & j^2 & j^2 & j & j & j & 1 & 1 \\ \hline \lambda_3 & 1 & j & j^2 & 1 & j & j^2 & 1 & j & j^2 & 1 & 1\\ \lambda_4 & 1 & j & j^2 & j & j^2 & 1 & j^2 & 1 & j & 1 & 1 \\ \lambda_5 & 1 & j & j^2 & j^2 & 1 & j & j & j^2 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ \hline \lambda_6 & 1 & j^2 & j & 1 & j^2 & j & 1 & j^2 & j & 1 & 1\\ \lambda_7 & 1 & j^2 & j & j & 1 & j^2 & j^2 & j & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ \lambda_8 & 1 & j^2 & j & j^2 & j & 1 & j & 1 & j^2 & 1 & 1 \\ \hline \rho_1 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \alpha & \alpha' \\ \rho_2 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \alpha' & \alpha \\ \end{array}.$$ I've chosen this strange order for the conjugacy classes so that the principal $8 \times 8$-submatrix is the character table of $C_3 \times C_3$. The simple lines are just there to emphasize the structure of this table.
I must say I'm still not satisfied... I spent some time to try and find an elegant definition of the elusive (but faithful!) three-dimensional representation (I say "the", because the two representations are conjugated by an element of the Galois group, so they are "essentially" the same) but I haven't much to show for it.
The only "concrete" manifestation I've found is that $G$ is the subgroup of $$\mathrm{Aff}_1(\mathbb Z/9) = \left\{ x \mapsto m x + p \middle| m \in (\mathbb Z/9)^\times, p\in \mathbb Z/9 \right\}$$ corresponding to the (index two) subgroup of $(\mathbb Z/9)^\times$ generated by $4$ (with this isomorphism, $a$ is $t\mapsto t+1$ and $b$ is $t\mapsto 4t$) and that the permutation representation on the 9-element set $\mathbb Z/9$ induced by this definition splits as $$\lambda_1 \oplus \lambda_2 \oplus \lambda_3 \oplus \rho_1 \oplus \rho_2,$$ where the three 1-dimensional $\lambda_i$ are the ones vanishing on $a$.
(Note that since $\alpha$ isn't an integer, there is no hope to find $\rho_1$ and $\rho_2$ as permutation representations. I think that they are likely to appear as something number-theoretic, perhaps in relation with the cyclotomic field $\mathbb Q(\zeta_9)$, but so far my attempts have been quite frustrated.)