I have the following problem
Find a finite group $G$ and $x, y \in G$, in which $|xy| > |x| |y|$.
Edit: I forgot the condition $\text{gcd(|x|, |y|})=1$. But it's too late to change the question now.
I am looking for any solution in general, but I would particularly be interested in a solution in $S_n$, since to me that seems to most natural place to look (since we know there has to be a solution in there).
My Attempt
So my final answer, after a lot of trial and error, came out to this:
$G =D_{10} \times S_5$, with $x = (s, (12))$ and $y = (sr, (345))$
Before this, I tried to find the answer in the familiar small non-abelian groups $D_8, Q_8, S_3$. When I saw this didn't work, I decided upon permutations. Again after a lot more trial and error, I came to this reasoning: suppose we work in $S_8$. The highest possible order of an element is $15$, and that would be a $3$ cycle with a $5$ cycle, using all the numbers $1-8$. So if we could get $|x|=2$ and $|y|=3$, that would work. But we have to use all $8$ numbers, so we can't just have a $2$ cycle and a $3$ cycle. Furthermore, from experience, I tried to make the permutations as "tangled" as possible, so I tried $(12)(34)(56)(78)$ times $(135)$. But this didn't work.
As you are probably aware, this could never happen in abelian group, since by commutativity we have $$|xy| = \operatorname{lcm}(|x|,|y|) \leq |x||y|.$$
Looking at $S_n$ works, and we can easily tell that $n\geq 5$, since $|x|,|y|\geq 2$ (otherwise at least one of $x,y$ is identity), so we need $|xy|$ at least $5$ (and that can't happen in $S_4$).
Let's look for that, we need $x$ and $y$ of order $2$, so $x$ and $y$ can consist of cycles of length at most $2$. We are trying to hit a permutation that consists of single cycle of length $5$, for example. Let's just randomly select $x = (12)(34)(5)$. Intuitively, $y$ should "mess up" the cycles of $x$ (or get the permutations "tangled", as you say), so let's pick $y = (13)(45)(2)$. We get that $xy = (14532)$, so $|x||y| = 2\cdot 2 \leq 5 = |xy|$.
I don't know if we there is something smarter that one could employ to avoid trial and error.