I have these $4$ sentences.
1) Dogs and Cats are pets.
2) Pluto and Bruno are dogs.
3) Kitty is a cat.
4) All dogs except Bruno eat bones.
I turned them in First-Order Logic Form.
$∀x(\mathrm{dog}(x) \to p(x) \wedge \mathrm{cat}(x) \to p(x))$
$\mathrm{dog(Pluto)} \wedge \mathrm{dog(Bruno)}$
- $\mathrm{Cat(Kitty)}$
- $∀x(((\mathrm{dog}(x)\wedge \neg \mathrm{ dog(Bruno))} \to \mathrm{E}(x,\mathrm{bones))} \wedge \mathrm{ ((dog}(x) \wedge \mathrm{dog(Bruno))} \to \neg \mathrm{E}(x,\mathrm{bones)))}$
I am not sure if sentence 4 is correct.
I need to prove the following sentence is correct:
Pluto doesn't eat bones.
I need to also prove the following sentence is not correct:
Pluto eats bones.
I tried negating both statements to prove them but I must have done something wrong. Can someone help?
Yeah, your 4 is not correct. Note that your:
$$\forall x ((Dog(x) \land \neg Dog(Bruno)) \to E(x,bones))$$
is trivially true given that $Dog(Bruno)$ is True, and hence $\neg Dog(Bruno)$ is False, and hence $Dog(x) \land \neg Dog(Bruno)$ is false for any $x$, and hence $(Dog(x) \land \neg Dog(Bruno)) \to E(x,bones)$ is True for any $x$, regardless of whether or not $x$ eats bones or not. So this is not what you want.
Instead, for the first half, try this:
$$\forall x ((Dog(x) \land \neg x = Bruno) \to E(x,bones))$$
Can you do the other half now yourself?
By the way: I don't see how you would prove that Pluto does not eat bones, given that Pluto is a dog and all dogs except Bruno do eat bones....