Let $X$ be a Borel space with a Borel measure $\mu$. Suppose $\xi: X\times X\to\mathbb R_{\geq 0}$ is a continuous function and put $s(x) = \{y\in X:\xi(x,y) = 0\}$. For any set $b\in\mathcal B(X)$ we put $$ \mathcal Sb = \bigcup\limits_{x\in b}s(x). $$ I am interested in the solutions of an equation $\mathcal Sb\subseteq b$, or even the generalized one: $$ \mu(\mathcal Sb\setminus b) = 0. $$ Could we say that these equations are fixpoint problems? If there is a literature for such problems?
2026-04-04 06:07:22.1775282842
Fixed point: sets and measures
263 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REFERENCE-REQUEST
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Random variables in integrals, how to analyze?
- Abstract Algebra Preparation
- Definition of matrix valued smooth function
- CLT for Martingales
- Almost locality of cubic spline interpolation
- Identify sequences from OEIS or the literature, or find examples of odd integers $n\geq 1$ satisfying these equations related to odd perfect numbers
- property of Lebesgue measure involving small intervals
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in SET-THEORY
- Theorems in MK would imply theorems in ZFC
- What formula proved in MK or Godel Incompleteness theorem
- Proving the schema of separation from replacement
- Understanding the Axiom of Replacement
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- Minimal model over forcing iteration
- How can I prove that the collection of all (class-)function from a proper class A to a class B is empty?
- max of limit cardinals smaller than a successor cardinal bigger than $\aleph_\omega$
- Canonical choice of many elements not contained in a set
- Non-standard axioms + ZF and rest of math
Related Questions in FIXED-POINT-THEOREMS
- Newton's method with no real roots
- Determine $ \ a_{\max} \ $ and $ \ a_{\min} \ $ so that the above difference equation is well-defined.
- Banach and Caristi fixed point theorems
- Show that $\Phi$ is a contraction with a maximum norm.
- Using Fixed point iteration to find sum of a Serias
- Map a closed function $f: (1,4) \rightarrow (1,4)$ without fixed point
- Stop criterium for fixed point methods
- Approximate solutions to nonlinear differential equations using an integral sequence
- Inverse function theorem via degree theory
- Fixed point of a map $\mathbb R^n \rightarrow \mathbb R^n$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The following is not so much an answer as it is a pointer to some connections with other areas that one might exploit.
Assume for simplicity that $X$ is a compact metric space. All the results I use can be found in the book Infinite Dimensional Analysis by Aliprantis and Border.
Then every closed subset of $X\times X$ is the zero-set of some function $\xi$ (just let $\xi$ be the distance to the subset), so we can dispense with the function $\xi$. This closed subset is the graph of the correspondence (or multifunction) $s$. That the graph is closed is equivalent to $s$ being an upper hemicontinuous correspondence (uhc) with closed values. Then $\mathcal{S}$ is simply the usual forward image of a set under a correspondence. The coordinatewise union of two uhc correspondences is uhc, so $s^*$ given by $s^*(x)=s(x)\cup\{x\}$ is uhc and compact-valued.
You are looking for the Borel sets $B$ such that $s^*(B)=B$. A compact valued uhc correspondence maps compact sets to compact sets, so $s^*(B)$ is an increasing function on the complete lattice of compact sets in $X$. So the set of compact fixed points forms a complete lattice, by the Tarski fixed point theorem. It might, however, be the case that $\emptyset$ and $X$ are the only such fixed points.
For general Borel sets, the problem is that uncountable unions of Borel sets are usually not Borel, so $s^*$ doesn't map $\mathcal{B}(X)$ to itself.