Consider the sum (which is a Fourier series and a Dirichlet series):
$$F(x)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n^{-s} \cos(2 \pi n x)$$
For $\Re(s)>1$ we have (thanks to absolute convergence) $\lim_{x \to 0} F(x)=\zeta(s)$ but does this holds for $0<\Re(s)<1$ ?
I am sure this is more than well known but I did not find it on internet, and as a simple Poisson summation formula does not answer the question, it is not completely easy, any reference ?
We shall see that the limit of $F(x)$ does not exist as $x\rightarrow 0^+$ for $0<s<1$. The following lemma follows from $$\cos(2\pi nx)\sin \pi x = \frac12 \left[ \sin \pi x(2n+1)-\sin \pi x(2n-1)\right]$$ and the telescoping sum.
Lemma 1
By partial summation, we have
Lemma 2
We replace $\sin\pi x(2\lfloor t \rfloor +1)$ by $\sin 2\pi x t$ at a cost of a uniformly bounded function. By change of variable $x t = u$, we have
Lemma 3
By the integral in this post: I'm looking for several ways to prove that $\int_{0}^{\infty }\sin(x)x^mdx=\cos(\frac{\pi m}{2})\Gamma (m+1)$
we have an expression for the integral.
Lemma 4
Back to the main problem, we have
Theorem
Therefore, for a fixed $0<s<1$, the limit of $F(x)$ as $x\rightarrow 0^+$ does not exist.