Suppose $f(t)$ and $F(\omega)$ are a Fourier transform pair. I want to show that $$\mathcal{F}^{-1} \left\{\frac{F(\omega)}{i\omega}\right\} = \int_{-\infty}^t f(\eta)\ \text{d}\eta$$ I start with the Fourier transform of the RHS and use integration by parts: $$\begin{align*} \mathcal{F}\left\{\int_{-\infty}^tf(\eta)\ \text{d}\eta \right\}\ &= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \int_{-\infty}^t f(\eta)\ \text{d}\eta\ e^{-i\omega t}\ \text{d}t \\&=\underbrace{\frac{-1}{i\omega}\left[\int_{-\infty}^t f(\eta)\ \text{d}\eta\ e^{-i\omega t}\right]_{t\ =-\infty}^{t\ =\ \infty}}_{=\ 0 ?}\ +\ \frac{1}{i\omega}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(t)\ e^{-i\omega t}\ \text{d}t\\ &= \frac{F(\omega)}{i\omega} \end{align*}$$ Hence $$\int_{-\infty}^t f(\eta)\ \text{d}\eta\ = \mathcal{F}^{-1} \left\{\frac{F(\omega)}{i\omega}\right\}$$
If the result is true I can see the first term on the RHS after performing the integration by parts must vanish but I'm not sure how to justify it. Any help on justifying it (or a cleaner approach to show the result) would be appreciated, thanks!
One may recall that
applying it with $$ g(t)=\int_{-\infty}^t f(\eta)\ \text{d}\eta, \quad g'(t)=f(t),\quad $$ the notation $F(\omega):=\mathcal{F}(f)(\omega)$, it gives $$ \frac{F(\omega)}{i\omega} =\mathcal{F}\left( \int_{-\infty}^t f(\eta)\ \text{d}\eta\right)(\omega) \tag2 $$ that is
Are you Ok with a proof of $(1)$ ?