Consider the differential equation
\begin{equation} (1+x^3)y''+4xy'+y =0 \end{equation}
I need to find a lower bound on the radius of convergence for above equation at $x=0\ \&\ x=2$.
I wrote the solution in Frobenius form \begin{equation} y(x) =\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}a_k x^{r+k} \end{equation}
Substituting back into the equation I got the following equations:
\begin{align} a_0 r(r-1) &= 0\\ a_1 r(r+1) &= 0\\ a_2 (r+2)(r+1) +a_0(4r+1) &=0\\ a_{k+3}(k+r+3)(k+r+2) + a_k (k+r-1)(k+r) + a_{k+1}(4k+4r+5) &=0 \quad \forall k\ge0 \end{align}
I try to use the fact that the necessary criterion for convergence of Frobenius series is
\begin{equation} \left|\frac{xa_{k}}{a_{k-1}}\right|<1 \implies \left|x\right|<\left|\frac{a_{k-1}}{a_{k}}\right| \end{equation}
For $r=0$, i get the recurrence relations as above. But can proceed on the bound.
Same thing for $r=1$, but I find only one parameter arbitrary instead of two even though this a second order ODE.
For $r=-1$, the solution is trivial. I'm stuck.
Since $a_0$ is the first non-zero term, then we must have $r=0$ or $r=1.$ The second equation then means that $r=0$ or $a_1=0,$ and does not imply that $r=-1$ is a possibility. In particular, $a_1=0$ in the $r=1$ case, which is why only one of the parameters is arbitrary. See here for another example where this happens, as well as an explanation of why we can (and should) assume that $a_0$ is the first non-zero term.