Let $A,B$ be two copies of the torus $T^2:=\mathbb{S^1}\times\mathbb{S^1}$. Fix coprime integers $p, q \in \mathbb{Z}$. Compute the fundamental group of $$C := A \sqcup B/ (A\ni (z, 0) \sim (z^p, z^q)\in B).$$ Clearly, we want to compute this using van Kampen. However, the glueing of the spaces confuses me. As I have seen in another question, we could remove something simple from $C$ twice, which makes the fundamental group structure of both $U$ and $V$ easier to compute. What would be a good choice of path-connected opens $U, V$ such that we can use their fundamental groups to compute the fundamental group of $C$?
2026-04-04 21:11:25.1775337085
Fundamental group of $(A \sqcup B)/\{A \ni (z,0) \sim (z^p,z^q) \in B\}$ where $A = B = T^2$ and $p,q$ coprime
104 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-TOPOLOGY
- How to compute homology group of $S^1 \times S^n$
- the degree of a map from $S^2$ to $S^2$
- Show $f$ and $g$ are both homeomorphism mapping of $T^2$ but $f$ is not homotopy equivalent with $g.$
- Chain homotopy on linear chains: confusion from Hatcher's book
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Are these cycles boundaries?
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- Cohomology groups of a torus minus a finite number of disjoint open disks
- CW-structure on $S^n$ and orientations
Related Questions in HOMOTOPY-THEORY
- how to prove this homotopic problem
- Are $[0,1]$ and $(0,1)$ homotopy equivalent?
- two maps are not homotopic equivalent
- the quotien space of $ S^1\times S^1$
- Can $X=SO(n)\setminus\{I_n\}$be homeomorphic to or homotopic equivalent to product of spheres?
- Why do $S^1 \wedge - $ and $Maps(S^1,-)$ form a Quillen adjunction?
- Is $S^{n-1}$ a deformation retract of $S^{n}$ \ {$k$ points}?
- Connection between Mayer-Vietoris and higher dimensional Seifert-Van Kampen Theorems
- Why is the number of exotic spheres equivalent to $S^7,S^{11},S^{15},S^{27}$ equal to perfect numbers?
- Are the maps homotopic?
Related Questions in FUNDAMENTAL-GROUPS
- Help resolving this contradiction in descriptions of the fundamental groups of the figure eight and n-torus
- $f$ has square root if and only if image of $f_*$ contained in $2 \mathbb Z$
- Homotopic maps between pointed sets induce same group homomorphism
- If $H \le \pi_1(X,x)$ is conjugate to $P_*(\pi_1(Y, y))$, then $H \cong P_*(\pi_1(Y, y'))$ for some $y' \in P^{-1}(x)$
- Calculating the fundamental group of $S^1$ with SvK
- Monodromy representation.
- A set of generators of $\pi_1(X,x_0)$ where $X=U\cup V$ and $U\cap V$ path connected
- Is the fundamental group of the image a subgroup of the fundamental group of the domain?
- Showing that $\pi_1(X/G) \cong G$.
- Fundamental group of a mapping cone
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let's take a moment to visualize the objects in question, at least in 2D.
We have a torus (with an embedded copy of $S^1$, shown squiggled):
which we're gluing to another torus along a more complicated copy of $S^1$ (also shown squiggled):
you can see that this copy of $S^1$ wraps around our square like a candy cane. In fact, before it meets itself, it wraps around the square $p$ many times "vertically",and $q$ many times "horizontally". See also here:
Let's call the first torus the "straight" torus, and the second torus the "candy cane" torus.
So what happens when we glue our toruses (tori?) together along the squiggly lines?
Well, we can do the standard Van Kampen trick: let $U$ be the straight torus, living as a subset of the final figure $C$. This isn't open, so we puff out just a little along the squiggly line into the candy cane torus. There's always an $\epsilon$ small enough to guarantee we keep a nice happy non-self-intersecting tube around the candy-cane squiggle, so this is an open set.
Similarly, we let $V$ be the candy cane torus (again, as a subset of $C$). This isn't open in the whole figure, so we puff out a little bit into the straight torus.
Now we find ourselves in the following situation:
We're now perfectly poised to use the Van Kampen theorem! This buys us a formula for the fundamental group of our whole figure:
$$\pi_1 C \cong \pi_1 U \ \underset{\pi_1 U \cap V}{\ast} \ \pi_1 V$$
Of course, we know the fundamental groups of torices and circles:
$$\pi_1 C \cong \mathbb Z^2 \underset{\mathbb{Z}}{\ast} \mathbb Z^2$$
This might be enough, but let's keep going! How might we fully compute this?
Well, we need to understand how $\mathbb{Z}$ sits inside of $\pi_1 U$ and inside $\pi_1 V$. That is, what loop does the squiggle represent?
For the straight torus, this is fairly easy: If our generators are $a$ and $b$ (say), then the squiggle corresponds to $a$.
For the candy cane torus, this takes a bit of thought. Call our generators $c$ and $d$. We want to find a homotopy from the squiggly line to some combination of these generating loops... A useful idea that shows up all the time in problems like this is to think outside the box:
From this image it becomes clear that the squiggly line is homotopic to $c^pd^q$. Just push it down towards the bottom right.
And now, when we amalgamate, we want to make the copy of $\mathbb{Z}$ generated by the straight squiggle equal to the copy of $\mathbb{Z}$ generated by the candy cane squiggle (since they're really the same squiggle!). How do we do that?
This looks like a lot of information, but really we're just naming the things we already knew about so that we can write down the explicit inclusion maps for the fundamental group of the squiggle.
But now we see the light at the end of the tunnel: We amalgamate to see
$$ \begin{aligned} \pi_1 C &= \pi_1 U \underset{\pi_1 U \cap V}{\ast} \pi_1 V \\ &= \langle a, b \mid [a,b] \rangle \underset{\langle s \rangle}{\ast} \langle c, d \mid [c,d] \rangle \\ &= \langle a, b, c, d \mid [a,b], [c,d], a = c^pd^q \rangle \end{aligned} $$
It's possible this can be simplified more, but I'll leave that to a better combinatorial group theorist than me.
I hope this helps ^_^