Let $(x,y,z)$ be a primitive Pythagorean triple with $x$ not congruent to $y$ modulo $2$.
Why do we say that $1+i$ does not divide $x+yi$?
Is there a lemma that connect the congruences with the divisiblity here?
Let $(x,y,z)$ be a primitive Pythagorean triple with $x$ not congruent to $y$ modulo $2$.
Why do we say that $1+i$ does not divide $x+yi$?
Is there a lemma that connect the congruences with the divisiblity here?
Suppose that $1+i|x+yi$, so exist $a,b \in \mathbb{Z}$ that $(a+bi)(1+i)=x+yi$ i.e. $(a-b) + (a+b)i=x+yi,$ so we have $x=a-b$ and $y=a+b$, hence $x-y=-2b \equiv 0 \ (\text{mod } 2)$. Contradiction.